Model Comparison
Gemini 1.0 Pro vs Mistral Small 3 24B InstructWhich is better in 2026?
Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct is 8.6x cheaper per token.
Verdict: Gemini 1.0 Pro vs Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct — which is better?
Gemini 1.0 Pro (by Google) and Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct (by Mistral AI) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.
Gemini 1.0 Pro outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct is better at 2 benchmarks (GPQA, MATH). Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.
On price, Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct is roughly 8.6x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.
Gemini 1.0 Pro also accepts a larger context window (32,760 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.
Choose Gemini 1.0 Pro if…
- you process long inputs — it offers a 32,760 token context window
Choose Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct if…
- you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 2 of 2 shared benchmarks
- cost matters — it's about 8.6x cheaper per token
- you want the most recent training data — it shipped Jan 2025
- you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune
Performance Benchmarks
Comparative analysis across standard metrics
Gemini 1.0 Pro outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct is better at 2 benchmarks (GPQA, MATH).
Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.
Arena Performance
Human preference votes
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
For input processing, Gemini 1.0 Pro ($0.50/1M tokens) is 7.1x more expensive than Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct ($0.07/1M tokens).
For output processing, Gemini 1.0 Pro ($1.50/1M tokens) is 10.7x more expensive than Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct ($0.14/1M tokens).
In conclusion, Gemini 1.0 Pro is more expensive than Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct.*
* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
Gemini 1.0 Pro accepts 32,760 input tokens compared to Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct's 32,000 tokens. Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct can generate longer responses up to 32,000 tokens, while Gemini 1.0 Pro is limited to 8,192 tokens.
License
Usage and distribution terms
Gemini 1.0 Pro is licensed under a proprietary license, while Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct uses Apache 2.0.
License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.
Proprietary
Closed source
Apache 2.0
Open weights
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
Gemini 1.0 Pro was released on 2024-02-15, while Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct was released on 2025-01-30.
Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct is 12 months newer than Gemini 1.0 Pro.
Feb 15, 2024
2.4 years ago
Jan 30, 2025
1.5 years ago
11mo newerKnowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Gemini 1.0 Pro has a knowledge cutoff of 2024-02-01, while Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct has a cutoff of 2023-10-01.
Gemini 1.0 Pro has more recent training data (up to 2024-02-01), making it potentially better informed about events through that date compared to Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct (2023-10-01).
Feb 2024
4 mo newerOct 2023
Provider Availability
Gemini 1.0 Pro is available from Google. Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct is available from DeepInfra, Mistral AI.
Gemini 1.0 Pro
Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct
Outputs Comparison
Key Takeaways
Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct
View detailsMistral AI
Detailed Comparison
Interactive Arena
Judge for yourself.
Run your own prompts against Gemini 1.0 Pro and Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.
| Feature |
|---|
FAQ
Common questions about Gemini 1.0 Pro vs Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct.