The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite vs Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite leads the LLM Stats Score 29.9 to 4.2. Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct is 14.8x cheaper per token.

Google · Mistral AI · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite leads the overall LLM Stats Score 29.9 to 4.2, ranking #123 overall.

On price, Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct is roughly 14.8x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite also accepts a larger context window (1,048,576 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite

  • overall performance matters — it scores 29.9 and ranks #123 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
  • you process long inputs — it offers a 1,048,576 token context window
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Jul 2026

Choose Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct

  • cost matters — it's about 14.8x cheaper per token
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Google
Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct
Mistral AI
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
29.9
#123
4.2
#302
Reasoning
25.9
#148
3.7
#297
Coding
16.0
#127
4.7
#204
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
$0.30 / M
$0.05 / M
Output price
$2.50 / M
$0.08 / M
Context window
1,048,576
32,768

Individual benchmarks

6 reported for Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite · 8 for Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct

No common benchmarks found

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite and Mistral Small 3 24B Instructdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct costs less

For input processing, Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite ($0.30/1M tokens) is 6.0x more expensive than Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct ($0.05/1M tokens).

For output processing, Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite ($2.50/1M tokens) is 31.3x more expensive than Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct ($0.08/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite is more expensive than Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Mon Sep 14 2026 • llm-stats.com
Google
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Input tokens$0.30
Output tokens$2.50
Best providerGoogle
Mistral AI
Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct
Input tokens$0.05
Output tokens$0.08
Best providerDeepinfra
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite accepts 1,048,576 input tokens compared to Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct's 32,768 tokens. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite can generate longer responses up to 65,536 tokens, while Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct is limited to 32,768 tokens.

Google
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output65,536 tokens
Mistral AI
Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct
Input32,768 tokens
Output32,768 tokens
Mon Sep 14 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite supports multimodal inputs, whereas Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct does not.

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite is licensed under a proprietary license, while Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite

Proprietary

Closed source

Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite was released on 2026-07-21, while Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct was released on 2025-01-30.

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite is 18 months newer than Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct.

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite

Jul 21, 2026

1 months ago

1.5yr newer
Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct

Jan 30, 2025

1.6 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite has a knowledge cutoff of 2026-03-31, while Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct has a cutoff of 2023-10-01.

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite has more recent training data (up to 2026-03-31), making it potentially better informed about events through that date compared to Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct (2023-10-01).

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite

Mar 2026

2.4 yr newer
Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct

Oct 2023

Provider Availability

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite is available from Google. Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct is available from DeepInfra, Mistral AI.

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite

google logo
Google
Input Price:Input: $0.30/1MOutput Price:Output: $2.50/1M

Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct

deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.05/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.08/1M
mistral logo
Mistral
Input Price:Input: $0.10/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.30/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite and Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
✓ Preferred
Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite vs Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct.

Which is better, Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite or Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct?

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite leads the LLM Stats Score 29.9 to 4.2. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite is made by Google and Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct is made by Mistral AI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite compare to Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct in benchmarks?

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite scores CharXiv-R: 76.5%, OSWorld-Verified: 74.0%, SWE-Bench Pro: 54.2%, Terminal-Bench 2.1: 54.0%, MLE-Bench: 39.2%. Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct scores Arena Hard: 87.6%, HumanEval: 84.8%, MT-Bench: 83.5%, IFEval: 82.9%, MATH: 70.6%.

Is Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite cheaper than Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct?

Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct is 6.0x cheaper for input tokens. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite costs $0.30/M input and $2.50/M output via google. Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct costs $0.05/M input and $0.08/M output via deepinfra.

What are the context window sizes for Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite and Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct?

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite supports 1.0M tokens and Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct supports 33K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite and Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (29.9 vs 4.2), context window (1.0M vs 33K), input pricing ($0.30 vs $0.05/M), multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite and Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct?

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite is developed by Google and Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct is developed by Mistral AI.

Related comparisons