Claude 3.5 Haiku vs Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
Claude 3.5 Haiku leads the LLM Stats Score 5.3 to -0.6. Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B is 12.5x cheaper per token.
Anthropic · Google · Updated for 2026
Which is better?
Claude 3.5 Haiku leads the overall LLM Stats Score 5.3 to -0.6, ranking #287 overall.
In the 3 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Claude 3.5 Haiku wins 3; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.
On price, Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B is roughly 12.5x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B also accepts a larger context window (1,048,576 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.
Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.
Choose Claude 3.5 Haiku
- overall performance matters — it scores 5.3 and ranks #287 on LLM Stats
- you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 3 of 3 exact shared results
- you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2024
Choose Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
- cost matters — it's about 12.5x cheaper per token
- you process long inputs — it offers a 1,048,576 token context window
At a glance
The differences that matter most.
Capability indexes
Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks
Individual benchmarks
9 reported for Claude 3.5 Haiku · 13 for Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
Claude 3.5 Haiku outperforms in 3 benchmarks (GPQA, MATH, MMLU-Pro), while Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B is better at 0 benchmarks.
Claude 3.5 Haiku significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.
Human preference
Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
For input processing, Claude 3.5 Haiku ($0.80/1M tokens) is 11.4x more expensive than Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B ($0.07/1M tokens).
For output processing, Claude 3.5 Haiku ($4.00/1M tokens) is 13.3x more expensive than Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B ($0.30/1M tokens).
In conclusion, Claude 3.5 Haiku is more expensive than Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B.*
* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B accepts 1,048,576 input tokens compared to Claude 3.5 Haiku's 200,000 tokens. Claude 3.5 Haiku can generate longer responses up to 200,000 tokens, while Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B is limited to 8,192 tokens.
Input capabilities
Documented input modalities across available providers
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B supports multimodal inputs, whereas Claude 3.5 Haiku does not.
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
License
Usage and distribution terms
Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.
Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.
Proprietary
Closed source
Proprietary
Closed source
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
Claude 3.5 Haiku was released on 2024-10-22, while Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B was released on 2024-03-15.
Claude 3.5 Haiku is 7 months newer than Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B.
Oct 22, 2024
1.9 years ago
7mo newerMar 15, 2024
2.5 years ago
Knowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-10-01, while Claude 3.5 Haiku's cutoff date is not specified.
We can confirm Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B's training data extends to 2024-10-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Claude 3.5 Haiku's cutoff date.
—
Oct 2024
Provider Availability
Claude 3.5 Haiku is available from Bedrock, Google, Anthropic. Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B is available from Google.
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
Outputs Comparison
Judge for yourself.
Run your own prompts against Claude 3.5 Haiku and Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.
FAQ
Common questions about Claude 3.5 Haiku vs Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B.