Model Comparison
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B vs Claude 3.5 HaikuWhich is better in 2026?
Claude 3.5 Haiku significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B is 12.5x cheaper per token.
Verdict: Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B vs Claude 3.5 Haiku — which is better?
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B (by Google) and Claude 3.5 Haiku (by Anthropic) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Claude 3.5 Haiku is better at 3 benchmarks (GPQA, MATH, MMLU-Pro). Claude 3.5 Haiku significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.
On price, Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B is roughly 12.5x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B also accepts a larger context window (1,048,576 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.
Choose Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B if…
- cost matters — it's about 12.5x cheaper per token
- you process long inputs — it offers a 1,048,576 token context window
Choose Claude 3.5 Haiku if…
- you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 3 of 3 shared benchmarks
- you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2024
Performance Benchmarks
Comparative analysis across standard metrics
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Claude 3.5 Haiku is better at 3 benchmarks (GPQA, MATH, MMLU-Pro).
Claude 3.5 Haiku significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.
Arena Performance
Human preference votes
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
For input processing, Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B ($0.07/1M tokens) is 11.4x cheaper than Claude 3.5 Haiku ($0.80/1M tokens).
For output processing, Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B ($0.30/1M tokens) is 13.3x cheaper than Claude 3.5 Haiku ($4.00/1M tokens).
In conclusion, Claude 3.5 Haiku is more expensive than Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B.*
* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B accepts 1,048,576 input tokens compared to Claude 3.5 Haiku's 200,000 tokens. Claude 3.5 Haiku can generate longer responses up to 200,000 tokens, while Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B is limited to 8,192 tokens.
Input Capabilities
Supported data types and modalities
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B supports multimodal inputs, whereas Claude 3.5 Haiku does not.
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
Claude 3.5 Haiku
License
Usage and distribution terms
Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.
Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.
Proprietary
Closed source
Proprietary
Closed source
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B was released on 2024-03-15, while Claude 3.5 Haiku was released on 2024-10-22.
Claude 3.5 Haiku is 7 months newer than Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B.
Mar 15, 2024
2.2 years ago
Oct 22, 2024
1.6 years ago
7mo newerKnowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-10-01, while Claude 3.5 Haiku's cutoff date is not specified.
We can confirm Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B's training data extends to 2024-10-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Claude 3.5 Haiku's cutoff date.
Oct 2024
—
Provider Availability
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B is available from Google. Claude 3.5 Haiku is available from Bedrock, Google, Anthropic.
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Outputs Comparison
Key Takeaways
Claude 3.5 Haiku
View detailsAnthropic
Detailed Comparison
| Feature |
|---|
FAQ
Common questions about Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B vs Claude 3.5 Haiku.