The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B vs Gemini 4 Argon

Gemini 4 Argon leads the LLM Stats Score 55.1 to -0.8.

Google · Google · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Gemini 4 Argon leads the overall LLM Stats Score 55.1 to -0.8, ranking #4 overall.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B

  • you want predictable pricing at $0.07/M input and $0.30/M output

Choose Gemini 4 Argon

  • overall performance matters — it scores 55.1 and ranks #4 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
Google
Gemini 4 Argon
Google
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
-0.8
#347
55.1
#4
Reasoning
-0.4
#338
52.4
#7
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
$0.07 / M
— / M
Output price
$0.30 / M
— / M
Context window
1,048,576
—

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

2 shared
Index
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
Gemini 4 Argon
Vision
-2.5#202
36.8#8
Multimodal
0.1#164
36.9#8
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

13 reported for Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B · 19 for Gemini 4 Argon

No common benchmarks found

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B and Gemini 4 Argondon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B specifies input context (1,048,576 tokens). Only Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B specifies output context (8,192 tokens).

Google
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output8,192 tokens
Google
Gemini 4 Argon
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Thu Oct 08 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B and Gemini 4 Argon support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Gemini 4 Argon

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B

Proprietary

Closed source

Gemini 4 Argon

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B was released on 2024-03-15, while Gemini 4 Argon was released on 2026-09-30.

Gemini 4 Argon is 31 months newer than Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B.

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B

Mar 15, 2024

2.6 years ago

Gemini 4 Argon

Sep 30, 2026

1 weeks ago

2.5yr newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-10-01, while Gemini 4 Argon's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B's training data extends to 2024-10-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Gemini 4 Argon's cutoff date.

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B

Oct 2024

Gemini 4 Argon

—

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B and Gemini 4 Argon side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
✓ Preferred
Gemini 4 Argon
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B vs Gemini 4 Argon.

Which is better, Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B or Gemini 4 Argon?

Gemini 4 Argon leads the LLM Stats Score 55.1 to -0.8. Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B is made by Google and Gemini 4 Argon is made by Google. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B compare to Gemini 4 Argon in benchmarks?

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B scores XSTest: 92.6%, FLEURS: 86.4%, Natural2Code: 75.5%, WMT23: 72.6%, Video-MME: 66.2%. Gemini 4 Argon scores Graphwalks BFS <128k: 99.7%, Vibe Code Bench: 91.9%, LVBench: 91.7%, LABBench2: 88.8%, Graphwalks BFS >128k: 84.2%.

What are the context window sizes for Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B and Gemini 4 Argon?

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B supports 1.0M tokens and Gemini 4 Argon supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B and Gemini 4 Argon?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (-0.8 vs 55.1). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Related comparisons