Model Comparison

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B vs Gemma 3n E4B

Comparing Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B and Gemma 3n E4B across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

No common benchmarks found

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B and Gemma 3n E4B don't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

0.0M diff

Gemma 3n E4B has 0.0B more parameters than Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B, making it 0.0% larger.

Google
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
8.0Bparameters
Google
Gemma 3n E4B
8.0Bparameters
8.0B
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
8.0B
Gemma 3n E4B

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B specifies input context (1,048,576 tokens). Only Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B specifies output context (8,192 tokens).

Google
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output8,192 tokens
Google
Gemma 3n E4B
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Tue May 26 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Both Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B and Gemma 3n E4B support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Gemma 3n E4B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B

Proprietary

Closed source

Gemma 3n E4B

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B was released on 2024-03-15, while Gemma 3n E4B was released on 2025-06-26.

Gemma 3n E4B is 16 months newer than Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B.

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B

Mar 15, 2024

2.2 years ago

Gemma 3n E4B

Jun 26, 2025

11 months ago

1.3yr newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B has a knowledge cutoff of 2024-10-01, while Gemma 3n E4B has a cutoff of 2024-06-01.

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B has more recent training data (up to 2024-10-01), making it potentially better informed about events through that date compared to Gemma 3n E4B (2024-06-01).

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B

Oct 2024

4 mo newer
Gemma 3n E4B

Jun 2024

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Google
Larger context window (1,048,576 tokens)
Google

No standout differentiators in the data we have for this pair.

GoogleGemini 1.5 Flash 8B
GoogleGemma 3n E4B
Compare in Playground

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Google
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
Google
Gemma 3n E4B

FAQ

Common questions about Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B vs Gemma 3n E4B.

Which is better, Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B or Gemma 3n E4B?

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B (Google) and Gemma 3n E4B (Google) each have strengths in different areas. Compare their benchmark scores, pricing, context windows, and capabilities above to determine which fits your needs.

How does Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B compare to Gemma 3n E4B in benchmarks?

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B scores XSTest: 92.6%, FLEURS: 86.4%, Natural2Code: 75.5%, WMT23: 72.6%, Video-MME: 66.2%. Gemma 3n E4B scores ARC-E: 81.6%, BoolQ: 81.6%, PIQA: 81.0%, HellaSwag: 78.6%, Winogrande: 71.7%.

What are the context window sizes for Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B and Gemma 3n E4B?

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B supports 1.0M tokens and Gemma 3n E4B supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.