Model Comparison

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B vs Mistral NeMo Instruct

Comparing Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B and Mistral NeMo Instruct across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

No common benchmarks found

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B and Mistral NeMo Instruct don't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B costs less

For input processing, Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B ($0.07/1M tokens) is 2.1x cheaper than Mistral NeMo Instruct ($0.15/1M tokens).

For output processing, Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B ($0.30/1M tokens) is 2.0x more expensive than Mistral NeMo Instruct ($0.15/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Mistral NeMo Instruct is more expensive than Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Thu Apr 16 2026 • llm-stats.com
Google
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
Input tokens$0.07
Output tokens$0.30
Best providerGoogle
Mistral AI
Mistral NeMo Instruct
Input tokens$0.15
Output tokens$0.15
Best providerGoogle
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

4.0B diff

Mistral NeMo Instruct has 4.0B more parameters than Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B, making it 50.0% larger.

Google
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
8.0Bparameters
Mistral AI
Mistral NeMo Instruct
12.0Bparameters
8.0B
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
12.0B
Mistral NeMo Instruct

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B accepts 1,048,576 input tokens compared to Mistral NeMo Instruct's 128,000 tokens. Mistral NeMo Instruct can generate longer responses up to 128,000 tokens, while Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B is limited to 8,192 tokens.

Google
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output8,192 tokens
Mistral AI
Mistral NeMo Instruct
Input128,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Thu Apr 16 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B supports multimodal inputs, whereas Mistral NeMo Instruct does not.

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Mistral NeMo Instruct

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B is licensed under a proprietary license, while Mistral NeMo Instruct uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B

Proprietary

Closed source

Mistral NeMo Instruct

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B was released on 2024-03-15, while Mistral NeMo Instruct was released on 2024-07-18.

Mistral NeMo Instruct is 4 months newer than Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B.

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B

Mar 15, 2024

2.1 years ago

Mistral NeMo Instruct

Jul 18, 2024

1.7 years ago

4mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-10-01, while Mistral NeMo Instruct's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B's training data extends to 2024-10-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Mistral NeMo Instruct's cutoff date.

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B

Oct 2024

Mistral NeMo Instruct

—

Provider Availability

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B is available from Google. Mistral NeMo Instruct is available from Google, Mistral AI.

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B

google logo
Google
Input Price:Input: $0.07/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.30/1M

Mistral NeMo Instruct

google logo
Google
Input Price:Input: $0.15/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.15/1M
mistral logo
Mistral
Input Price:Input: $0.15/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.15/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Google
Larger context window (1,048,576 tokens)
Supports multimodal inputs
Less expensive input tokens
Mistral AI
Less expensive output tokens
Has open weights
GoogleGemini 1.5 Flash 8B
Mistral AIMistral NeMo Instruct
Compare in Playground

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Google
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
Mistral AI
Mistral NeMo Instruct

FAQ

Common questions about Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B vs Mistral NeMo Instruct

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B (Google) and Mistral NeMo Instruct (Mistral AI) each have strengths in different areas. Compare their benchmark scores, pricing, context windows, and capabilities above to determine which fits your needs.
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B scores XSTest: 92.6%, FLEURS: 86.4%, Natural2Code: 75.5%, WMT23: 72.6%, Video-MME: 66.2%. Mistral NeMo Instruct scores HellaSwag: 83.5%, Winogrande: 76.8%, TriviaQA: 73.8%, CommonSenseQA: 70.4%, MMLU: 68.0%.
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B is 2.1x cheaper for input tokens. Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B costs $0.07/M input and $0.30/M output via google. Mistral NeMo Instruct costs $0.15/M input and $0.15/M output via google.
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B supports 1.0M tokens and Mistral NeMo Instruct supports 128K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.
Key differences include context window (1.0M vs 128K), input pricing ($0.07 vs $0.15/M), multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B is developed by Google and Mistral NeMo Instruct is developed by Mistral AI.