Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B vs Qwen2.5 72B Instruct Comparison

Comparing Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B and Qwen2.5 72B Instruct across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

3 benchmarks

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Qwen2.5 72B Instruct is better at 3 benchmarks (GPQA, MATH, MMLU-Pro).

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Sun Mar 15 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B costs less

For input processing, Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B ($0.07/1M tokens) is 5.0x cheaper than Qwen2.5 72B Instruct ($0.35/1M tokens).

For output processing, Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B ($0.30/1M tokens) is 1.3x cheaper than Qwen2.5 72B Instruct ($0.40/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Qwen2.5 72B Instruct is more expensive than Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers

Sun Mar 15 2026 • llm-stats.com

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B

Input tokens$0.07

Output tokens$0.30

Best providerGoogle

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct

Input tokens$0.35

Output tokens$0.40

Best providerDeepinfra

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

64.7B diff

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct has 64.7B more parameters than Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B, making it 808.8% larger.

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B

8.0Bparameters

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct

72.7Bparameters

8.0B

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B

72.7B

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B accepts 1,048,576 input tokens compared to Qwen2.5 72B Instruct's 131,072 tokens. Both models can generate responses up to 8,192 tokens.

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B

Input1,048,576 tokens

Output8,192 tokens

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct

Input131,072 tokens

Output8,192 tokens

Sun Mar 15 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B supports multimodal inputs, whereas Qwen2.5 72B Instruct does not.

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B

Text

Images

Audio

Video

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct

Text

Images

Audio

Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B is licensed under a proprietary license, while Qwen2.5 72B Instruct uses Qwen.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B

Proprietary

Closed source

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct

Qwen

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B was released on 2024-03-15, while Qwen2.5 72B Instruct was released on 2024-09-19.

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct is 6 months newer than Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B.

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B

Mar 15, 2024

2.0 years ago

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct

Sep 19, 2024

1.5 years ago

6mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-10-01, while Qwen2.5 72B Instruct's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B's training data extends to 2024-10-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Qwen2.5 72B Instruct's cutoff date.

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B

Oct 2024

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct

—

Provider Availability

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B is available from Google. Qwen2.5 72B Instruct is available from DeepInfra, Hyperbolic, Fireworks, Together. The availability of providers can affect quality of the model and reliability.