Model Comparison

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B vs Qwen2.5 7B Instruct

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks. Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B is 2.4x cheaper per token.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

3 benchmarks

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B outperforms in 2 benchmarks (GPQA, MMLU-Pro), while Qwen2.5 7B Instruct is better at 1 benchmark (MATH).

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

Sun Apr 05 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B costs less

For input processing, Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B ($0.07/1M tokens) is 4.3x cheaper than Qwen2.5 7B Instruct ($0.30/1M tokens).

For output processing, Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B ($0.30/1M tokens) costs the same as Qwen2.5 7B Instruct ($0.30/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Qwen2.5 7B Instruct is more expensive than Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Sun Apr 05 2026 • llm-stats.com
Google
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
Input tokens$0.07
Output tokens$0.30
Best providerGoogle
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
Input tokens$0.30
Output tokens$0.30
Best providerTogether
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

390.0M diff

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B has 0.4B more parameters than Qwen2.5 7B Instruct, making it 5.1% larger.

Google
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
8.0Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
7.6Bparameters
8.0B
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
7.6B
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B accepts 1,048,576 input tokens compared to Qwen2.5 7B Instruct's 131,072 tokens. Both models can generate responses up to 8,192 tokens.

Google
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output8,192 tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
Input131,072 tokens
Output8,192 tokens
Sun Apr 05 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B supports multimodal inputs, whereas Qwen2.5 7B Instruct does not.

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen2.5 7B Instruct

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B is licensed under a proprietary license, while Qwen2.5 7B Instruct uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B

Proprietary

Closed source

Qwen2.5 7B Instruct

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B was released on 2024-03-15, while Qwen2.5 7B Instruct was released on 2024-09-19.

Qwen2.5 7B Instruct is 6 months newer than Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B.

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B

Mar 15, 2024

2.1 years ago

Qwen2.5 7B Instruct

Sep 19, 2024

1.5 years ago

6mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-10-01, while Qwen2.5 7B Instruct's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B's training data extends to 2024-10-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Qwen2.5 7B Instruct's cutoff date.

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B

Oct 2024

Qwen2.5 7B Instruct

—

Provider Availability

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B is available from Google. Qwen2.5 7B Instruct is available from Together.

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B

google logo
Google
Input Price:Input: $0.07/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.30/1M

Qwen2.5 7B Instruct

together logo
Together
Input Price:Input: $0.30/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.30/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Google
Larger context window (1,048,576 tokens)
Supports multimodal inputs
Less expensive input tokens
Higher GPQA score (38.4% vs 36.4%)
Higher MMLU-Pro score (58.7% vs 56.3%)
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Qwen2.5 7B Instruct

View details

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Has open weights
Higher MATH score (75.5% vs 58.7%)
GoogleGemini 1.5 Flash 8B
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamQwen2.5 7B Instruct
Compare in Playground

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Google
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct

FAQ

Common questions about Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B vs Qwen2.5 7B Instruct

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks. Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B is made by Google and Qwen2.5 7B Instruct is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B scores XSTest: 92.6%, FLEURS: 86.4%, Natural2Code: 75.5%, WMT23: 72.6%, Video-MME: 66.2%. Qwen2.5 7B Instruct scores GSM8k: 91.6%, MT-Bench: 87.5%, HumanEval: 84.8%, MBPP: 79.2%, MATH: 75.5%.
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B is 4.3x cheaper for input tokens. Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B costs $0.07/M input and $0.30/M output via google. Qwen2.5 7B Instruct costs $0.30/M input and $0.30/M output via together.
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B supports 1.0M tokens and Qwen2.5 7B Instruct supports 131K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.
Key differences include context window (1.0M vs 131K), input pricing ($0.07 vs $0.30/M), multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B is developed by Google and Qwen2.5 7B Instruct is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.