The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B vs Qwen2.5 7B Instruct

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B and Qwen2.5 7B Instruct are closely matched at -0.6 and 2.7 on the LLM Stats Score. Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B is 2.4x cheaper per token.

Google · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B and Qwen2.5 7B Instruct are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at -0.6 and 2.7.

In the 3 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B wins 2; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

On price, Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B is roughly 2.4x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B also accepts a larger context window (1,048,576 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B

  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 2 of 3 exact shared results
  • cost matters — it's about 2.4x cheaper per token
  • you process long inputs — it offers a 1,048,576 token context window

Choose Qwen2.5 7B Instruct

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2024
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
Google
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
-0.6
#317
2.7
#299
Reasoning
-0.2
#306
2.9
#291
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
2 of 3
1 of 3
Input price
$0.07 / M
$0.30 / M
Output price
$0.30 / M
$0.30 / M
Context window
1,048,576
131,072

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
Math
2.7#283
8.5#251
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

13 reported for Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B · 14 for Qwen2.5 7B Instruct

3 shared

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B outperforms in 2 benchmarks (GPQA, MMLU-Pro), while Qwen2.5 7B Instruct is better at 1 benchmark (MATH).

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

Wed Sep 02 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B costs less

For input processing, Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B ($0.07/1M tokens) is 4.3x cheaper than Qwen2.5 7B Instruct ($0.30/1M tokens).

For output processing, Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B ($0.30/1M tokens) costs the same as Qwen2.5 7B Instruct ($0.30/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Qwen2.5 7B Instruct is more expensive than Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Wed Sep 02 2026 • llm-stats.com
Google
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
Input tokens$0.07
Output tokens$0.30
Best providerGoogle
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
Input tokens$0.30
Output tokens$0.30
Best providerTogether
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

390.0M diff

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B has 0.4B more parameters than Qwen2.5 7B Instruct, making it 5.1% larger.

Google
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
8.0Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
7.6Bparameters
8.0B
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
7.6B
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B accepts 1,048,576 input tokens compared to Qwen2.5 7B Instruct's 131,072 tokens. Both models can generate responses up to 8,192 tokens.

Google
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output8,192 tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
Input131,072 tokens
Output8,192 tokens
Wed Sep 02 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B supports multimodal inputs, whereas Qwen2.5 7B Instruct does not.

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen2.5 7B Instruct

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B is licensed under a proprietary license, while Qwen2.5 7B Instruct uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B

Proprietary

Closed source

Qwen2.5 7B Instruct

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B was released on 2024-03-15, while Qwen2.5 7B Instruct was released on 2024-09-19.

Qwen2.5 7B Instruct is 6 months newer than Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B.

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B

Mar 15, 2024

2.5 years ago

Qwen2.5 7B Instruct

Sep 19, 2024

2.0 years ago

6mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-10-01, while Qwen2.5 7B Instruct's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B's training data extends to 2024-10-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Qwen2.5 7B Instruct's cutoff date.

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B

Oct 2024

Qwen2.5 7B Instruct

—

Provider Availability

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B is available from Google. Qwen2.5 7B Instruct is available from Together.

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B

google logo
Google
Input Price:Input: $0.07/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.30/1M

Qwen2.5 7B Instruct

together logo
Together
Input Price:Input: $0.30/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.30/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B and Qwen2.5 7B Instruct side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
✓ Preferred
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B vs Qwen2.5 7B Instruct.

Which is better, Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B or Qwen2.5 7B Instruct?

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B and Qwen2.5 7B Instruct are closely matched on the LLM Stats Score at -0.6 and 2.7. Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B is made by Google and Qwen2.5 7B Instruct is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B compare to Qwen2.5 7B Instruct in benchmarks?

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B scores XSTest: 92.6%, FLEURS: 86.4%, Natural2Code: 75.5%, WMT23: 72.6%, Video-MME: 66.2%. Qwen2.5 7B Instruct scores GSM8k: 91.6%, MT-Bench: 87.5%, HumanEval: 84.8%, MBPP: 79.2%, MATH: 75.5%.

Is Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B cheaper than Qwen2.5 7B Instruct?

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B is 4.3x cheaper for input tokens. Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B costs $0.07/M input and $0.30/M output via google. Qwen2.5 7B Instruct costs $0.30/M input and $0.30/M output via together.

What are the context window sizes for Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B and Qwen2.5 7B Instruct?

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B supports 1.0M tokens and Qwen2.5 7B Instruct supports 131K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B and Qwen2.5 7B Instruct?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (-0.6 vs 2.7), context window (1.0M vs 131K), input pricing ($0.07 vs $0.30/M), multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B and Qwen2.5 7B Instruct?

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B is developed by Google and Qwen2.5 7B Instruct is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.

Related comparisons