The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B vs Qwen2 72B Instruct

Qwen2 72B Instruct leads the LLM Stats Score 5.8 to -0.8.

Google · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Qwen2 72B Instruct leads the overall LLM Stats Score 5.8 to -0.8, ranking #302 overall.

In the 3 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Qwen2 72B Instruct wins 3; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B

  • you want predictable pricing at $0.07/M input and $0.30/M output

Choose Qwen2 72B Instruct

  • overall performance matters — it scores 5.8 and ranks #302 on LLM Stats
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 3 of 3 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Jul 2024
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
Google
Qwen2 72B Instruct
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
-0.8
#339
5.8
#302
Reasoning
-0.4
#330
5.7
#298
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
0 of 3
3 of 3
Input price
$0.07 / M
— / M
Output price
$0.30 / M
— / M
Context window
1,048,576
—

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
Qwen2 72B Instruct
Math
2.4#294
11.0#248
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

13 reported for Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B · 17 for Qwen2 72B Instruct

3 shared

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Qwen2 72B Instruct is better at 3 benchmarks (GPQA, MATH, MMLU-Pro).

Qwen2 72B Instruct significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Sat Oct 03 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

64.0B diff

Qwen2 72B Instruct has 64.0B more parameters than Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B, making it 800.0% larger.

Google
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
8.0Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2 72B Instruct
72.0Bparameters
8.0B
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
72.0B
Qwen2 72B Instruct

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B specifies input context (1,048,576 tokens). Only Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B specifies output context (8,192 tokens).

Google
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output8,192 tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2 72B Instruct
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Sat Oct 03 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B supports multimodal inputs, whereas Qwen2 72B Instruct does not.

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen2 72B Instruct

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B is licensed under a proprietary license, while Qwen2 72B Instruct uses tongyi-qianwen.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B

Proprietary

Closed source

Qwen2 72B Instruct

tongyi-qianwen

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B was released on 2024-03-15, while Qwen2 72B Instruct was released on 2024-07-23.

Qwen2 72B Instruct is 4 months newer than Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B.

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B

Mar 15, 2024

2.6 years ago

Qwen2 72B Instruct

Jul 23, 2024

2.2 years ago

4mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-10-01, while Qwen2 72B Instruct's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B's training data extends to 2024-10-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Qwen2 72B Instruct's cutoff date.

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B

Oct 2024

Qwen2 72B Instruct

—

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B and Qwen2 72B Instruct side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
✓ Preferred
Qwen2 72B Instruct
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B vs Qwen2 72B Instruct.

Which is better, Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B or Qwen2 72B Instruct?

Qwen2 72B Instruct leads the LLM Stats Score 5.8 to -0.8. Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B is made by Google and Qwen2 72B Instruct is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B compare to Qwen2 72B Instruct in benchmarks?

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B scores XSTest: 92.6%, FLEURS: 86.4%, Natural2Code: 75.5%, WMT23: 72.6%, Video-MME: 66.2%. Qwen2 72B Instruct scores GSM8k: 91.1%, CMMLU: 90.1%, HellaSwag: 87.6%, HumanEval: 86.0%, Winogrande: 85.1%.

What are the context window sizes for Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B and Qwen2 72B Instruct?

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B supports 1.0M tokens and Qwen2 72B Instruct supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B and Qwen2 72B Instruct?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (-0.8 vs 5.8), multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Proprietary vs tongyi-qianwen). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B and Qwen2 72B Instruct?

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B is developed by Google and Qwen2 72B Instruct is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.

Related comparisons