Gemini 1.5 Flash vs Gemini 2.0 Flash

Comparing Gemini 1.5 Flash by Google and Gemini 2.0 Flash by Google across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

Gemini 2.0 Flash significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Gemini 2.0 Flash is 1.5x cheaper per token.

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

8 benchmarks

Gemini 1.5 Flash outperforms in 1 benchmarks (MRCR), while Gemini 2.0 Flash is better at 7 benchmarks (GPQA, HiddenMath, MATH, MMLU-Pro, MMMU, Natural2Code, Vibe-Eval).

Gemini 2.0 Flash significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Tue Mar 24 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Gemini 2.0 Flash costs less

For input processing, Gemini 1.5 Flash ($0.15/1M tokens) is 1.5x more expensive than Gemini 2.0 Flash ($0.10/1M tokens).

For output processing, Gemini 1.5 Flash ($0.60/1M tokens) is 1.5x more expensive than Gemini 2.0 Flash ($0.40/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Gemini 1.5 Flash is more expensive than Gemini 2.0 Flash.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Tue Mar 24 2026 • llm-stats.com
Google
Gemini 1.5 Flash
Input tokens$0.15
Output tokens$0.60
Best providerGoogle
Google
Gemini 2.0 Flash
Input tokens$0.10
Output tokens$0.40
Best providerGoogle
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Both models have the same input context window of 1,048,576 tokens. Both models can generate responses up to 8,192 tokens.

Google
Gemini 1.5 Flash
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output8,192 tokens
Google
Gemini 2.0 Flash
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output8,192 tokens
Tue Mar 24 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Both Gemini 1.5 Flash and Gemini 2.0 Flash support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Gemini 1.5 Flash

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Gemini 2.0 Flash

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Gemini 1.5 Flash

Proprietary

Closed source

Gemini 2.0 Flash

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 1.5 Flash was released on 2024-05-01, while Gemini 2.0 Flash was released on 2024-12-01.

Gemini 2.0 Flash is 7 months newer than Gemini 1.5 Flash.

Gemini 1.5 Flash

May 1, 2024

1.9 years ago

Gemini 2.0 Flash

Dec 1, 2024

1.3 years ago

7mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemini 1.5 Flash has a knowledge cutoff of 2023-11-01, while Gemini 2.0 Flash has a cutoff of 2024-08-01.

Gemini 2.0 Flash has more recent training data (up to 2024-08-01), making it potentially better informed about events through that date compared to Gemini 1.5 Flash (2023-11-01).

Gemini 1.5 Flash

Nov 2023

Gemini 2.0 Flash

Aug 2024

9 mo newer

Provider Availability

Gemini 1.5 Flash is available from Google. Gemini 2.0 Flash is available from Google. The availability of providers can affect quality of the model and reliability.

Gemini 1.5 Flash

google logo
Google
Input Price:Input: $0.15/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.60/1M

Gemini 2.0 Flash

google logo
Google
Input Price:Input: $0.10/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.40/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Key Takeaways

Higher MRCR score (71.9% vs 69.2%)
Less expensive input tokens
Less expensive output tokens
Higher GPQA score (62.1% vs 51.0%)
Higher HiddenMath score (63.0% vs 47.2%)
Higher MATH score (89.7% vs 77.9%)
Higher MMLU-Pro score (76.4% vs 67.3%)
Higher MMMU score (70.7% vs 62.3%)
Higher Natural2Code score (92.9% vs 79.8%)
Higher Vibe-Eval score (56.3% vs 48.9%)
GoogleGemini 1.5 Flash
GoogleGemini 2.0 Flash

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Google
Gemini 1.5 Flash
Google
Gemini 2.0 Flash