The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Gemini 1.5 Flash vs Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1

Gemini 1.5 Flash and Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 are closely matched at 6.0 and 4.8 on the LLM Stats Score.

Google · NVIDIA · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Gemini 1.5 Flash and Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at 6.0 and 4.8.

In the 1 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 wins 1; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Gemini 1.5 Flash

  • you want predictable pricing at $0.15/M input and $0.60/M output

Choose Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1

  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 1 of 1 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Mar 2025
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Gemini 1.5 Flash
Google
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1
NVIDIA
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
6.0
#299
4.8
#306
Reasoning
5.6
#297
5.3
#301
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
0 of 1
1 of 1
Input price
$0.15 / M
— / M
Output price
$0.60 / M
— / M
Context window
1,048,576
—

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
Gemini 1.5 Flash
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1
Math
10.6#252
8.8#258
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

22 reported for Gemini 1.5 Flash · 7 for Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1

1 shared

Gemini 1.5 Flash outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 is better at 1 benchmark (GPQA).

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Wed Sep 23 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Gemini 1.5 Flash specifies input context (1,048,576 tokens). Only Gemini 1.5 Flash specifies output context (8,192 tokens).

Google
Gemini 1.5 Flash
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output8,192 tokens
NVIDIA
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Wed Sep 23 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Gemini 1.5 Flash supports multimodal inputs, whereas Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 does not.

Gemini 1.5 Flash can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Gemini 1.5 Flash

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemini 1.5 Flash is licensed under a proprietary license, while Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 uses Llama 3.1 Community License.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemini 1.5 Flash

Proprietary

Closed source

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1

Llama 3.1 Community License

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 1.5 Flash was released on 2024-05-01, while Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 was released on 2025-03-18.

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 is 11 months newer than Gemini 1.5 Flash.

Gemini 1.5 Flash

May 1, 2024

2.4 years ago

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1

Mar 18, 2025

1.5 years ago

10mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemini 1.5 Flash has a knowledge cutoff of 2023-11-01, while Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 has a cutoff of 2023-12-31.

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 has more recent training data (up to 2023-12-31), making it potentially better informed about events through that date compared to Gemini 1.5 Flash (2023-11-01).

Gemini 1.5 Flash

Nov 2023

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1

Dec 2023

1 mo newer

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemini 1.5 Flash and Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemini 1.5 Flash
✓ Preferred
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Gemini 1.5 Flash vs Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1.

Which is better, Gemini 1.5 Flash or Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1?

Gemini 1.5 Flash and Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 are closely matched on the LLM Stats Score at 6.0 and 4.8. Gemini 1.5 Flash is made by Google and Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 is made by NVIDIA. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Gemini 1.5 Flash compare to Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 in benchmarks?

Gemini 1.5 Flash scores XSTest: 97.0%, FLEURS: 90.4%, HellaSwag: 86.5%, GSM8k: 86.2%, BIG-Bench Hard: 85.5%. Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 scores MATH-500: 95.4%, MBPP: 84.6%, MT-Bench: 81.0%, IFEval: 79.3%, BFCL v2: 63.6%.

What are the context window sizes for Gemini 1.5 Flash and Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1?

Gemini 1.5 Flash supports 1.0M tokens and Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Gemini 1.5 Flash and Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (6.0 vs 4.8), multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Proprietary vs Llama 3.1 Community License). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemini 1.5 Flash and Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1?

Gemini 1.5 Flash is developed by Google and Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 is developed by NVIDIA.

Related comparisons