The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Gemini 1.5 Flash vs Qwen2.5 72B Instruct

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct leads the LLM Stats Score 12.1 to 6.0. Gemini 1.5 Flash is 1.4x cheaper per token.

Google · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct leads the overall LLM Stats Score 12.1 to 6.0, ranking #252 overall.

In the 5 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Qwen2.5 72B Instruct wins 4; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

On price, Gemini 1.5 Flash is roughly 1.4x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Gemini 1.5 Flash also accepts a larger context window (1,048,576 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Gemini 1.5 Flash

  • cost matters — it's about 1.4x cheaper per token
  • you process long inputs — it offers a 1,048,576 token context window

Choose Qwen2.5 72B Instruct

  • overall performance matters — it scores 12.1 and ranks #252 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 4 of 5 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2024
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Gemini 1.5 Flash
Google
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
6.0
#292
12.1
#252
Reasoning
5.6
#291
12.2
#244
Coding
-0.3
#242
9.2
#175
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
1 of 5
4 of 5
Input price
$0.15 / M
$0.35 / M
Output price
$0.60 / M
$0.40 / M
Context window
1,048,576
131,072

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
Gemini 1.5 Flash
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
Math
10.6#251
17.8#191
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

22 reported for Gemini 1.5 Flash · 14 for Qwen2.5 72B Instruct

5 shared

Gemini 1.5 Flash outperforms in 1 benchmarks (GPQA), while Qwen2.5 72B Instruct is better at 4 benchmarks (GSM8k, HumanEval, MATH, MMLU-Pro).

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Tue Sep 15 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Gemini 1.5 Flash costs less

For input processing, Gemini 1.5 Flash ($0.15/1M tokens) is 2.3x cheaper than Qwen2.5 72B Instruct ($0.35/1M tokens).

For output processing, Gemini 1.5 Flash ($0.60/1M tokens) is 1.5x more expensive than Qwen2.5 72B Instruct ($0.40/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Qwen2.5 72B Instruct is more expensive than Gemini 1.5 Flash.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Tue Sep 15 2026 • llm-stats.com
Google
Gemini 1.5 Flash
Input tokens$0.15
Output tokens$0.60
Best providerGoogle
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
Input tokens$0.35
Output tokens$0.40
Best providerDeepinfra
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Gemini 1.5 Flash accepts 1,048,576 input tokens compared to Qwen2.5 72B Instruct's 131,072 tokens. Both models can generate responses up to 8,192 tokens.

Google
Gemini 1.5 Flash
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output8,192 tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
Input131,072 tokens
Output8,192 tokens
Tue Sep 15 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Gemini 1.5 Flash supports multimodal inputs, whereas Qwen2.5 72B Instruct does not.

Gemini 1.5 Flash can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Gemini 1.5 Flash

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemini 1.5 Flash is licensed under a proprietary license, while Qwen2.5 72B Instruct uses Qwen.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemini 1.5 Flash

Proprietary

Closed source

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct

Qwen

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 1.5 Flash was released on 2024-05-01, while Qwen2.5 72B Instruct was released on 2024-09-19.

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct is 5 months newer than Gemini 1.5 Flash.

Gemini 1.5 Flash

May 1, 2024

2.4 years ago

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct

Sep 19, 2024

2.0 years ago

4mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemini 1.5 Flash has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2023-11-01, while Qwen2.5 72B Instruct's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemini 1.5 Flash's training data extends to 2023-11-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Qwen2.5 72B Instruct's cutoff date.

Gemini 1.5 Flash

Nov 2023

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct

—

Provider Availability

Gemini 1.5 Flash is available from Google. Qwen2.5 72B Instruct is available from DeepInfra, Hyperbolic, Fireworks, Together.

Gemini 1.5 Flash

google logo
Google
Input Price:Input: $0.15/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.60/1M

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct

deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.35/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.40/1M
hyperbolic logo
Hyperbolic
Input Price:Input: $0.40/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.40/1M
fireworks logo
Fireworks
Input Price:Input: $0.89/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.89/1M
together logo
Together
Input Price:Input: $1.20/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.20/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemini 1.5 Flash and Qwen2.5 72B Instruct side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemini 1.5 Flash
✓ Preferred
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Gemini 1.5 Flash vs Qwen2.5 72B Instruct.

Which is better, Gemini 1.5 Flash or Qwen2.5 72B Instruct?

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct leads the LLM Stats Score 12.1 to 6.0. Gemini 1.5 Flash is made by Google and Qwen2.5 72B Instruct is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Gemini 1.5 Flash compare to Qwen2.5 72B Instruct in benchmarks?

Gemini 1.5 Flash scores XSTest: 97.0%, FLEURS: 90.4%, HellaSwag: 86.5%, GSM8k: 86.2%, BIG-Bench Hard: 85.5%. Qwen2.5 72B Instruct scores GSM8k: 95.8%, MT-Bench: 93.5%, MBPP: 88.2%, MMLU-Redux: 86.8%, HumanEval: 86.6%.

Is Gemini 1.5 Flash cheaper than Qwen2.5 72B Instruct?

Gemini 1.5 Flash is 2.3x cheaper for input tokens. Gemini 1.5 Flash costs $0.15/M input and $0.60/M output via google. Qwen2.5 72B Instruct costs $0.35/M input and $0.40/M output via deepinfra.

What are the context window sizes for Gemini 1.5 Flash and Qwen2.5 72B Instruct?

Gemini 1.5 Flash supports 1.0M tokens and Qwen2.5 72B Instruct supports 131K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Gemini 1.5 Flash and Qwen2.5 72B Instruct?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (6.0 vs 12.1), context window (1.0M vs 131K), input pricing ($0.15 vs $0.35/M), multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Proprietary vs Qwen). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemini 1.5 Flash and Qwen2.5 72B Instruct?

Gemini 1.5 Flash is developed by Google and Qwen2.5 72B Instruct is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.

Related comparisons