Model Comparison

Gemini 1.5 Pro vs Claude 3.5 Haiku

Gemini 1.5 Pro shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks. Claude 3.5 Haiku is 2.7x cheaper per token.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

6 benchmarks

Gemini 1.5 Pro outperforms in 4 benchmarks (GPQA, MATH, MGSM, MMLU-Pro), while Claude 3.5 Haiku is better at 2 benchmarks (DROP, HumanEval).

Gemini 1.5 Pro shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

Wed Apr 01 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Claude 3.5 Haiku costs less

For input processing, Gemini 1.5 Pro ($2.50/1M tokens) is 3.1x more expensive than Claude 3.5 Haiku ($0.80/1M tokens).

For output processing, Gemini 1.5 Pro ($10.00/1M tokens) is 2.5x more expensive than Claude 3.5 Haiku ($4.00/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Gemini 1.5 Pro is more expensive than Claude 3.5 Haiku.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Wed Apr 01 2026 • llm-stats.com
Google
Gemini 1.5 Pro
Input tokens$2.50
Output tokens$10.00
Best providerGoogle
Anthropic
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Input tokens$0.80
Output tokens$4.00
Best providerAWS Bedrock
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Gemini 1.5 Pro accepts 2,097,152 input tokens compared to Claude 3.5 Haiku's 200,000 tokens. Claude 3.5 Haiku can generate longer responses up to 200,000 tokens, while Gemini 1.5 Pro is limited to 8,192 tokens.

Google
Gemini 1.5 Pro
Input2,097,152 tokens
Output8,192 tokens
Anthropic
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Input200,000 tokens
Output200,000 tokens
Wed Apr 01 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Gemini 1.5 Pro supports multimodal inputs, whereas Claude 3.5 Haiku does not.

Gemini 1.5 Pro can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Gemini 1.5 Pro

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Claude 3.5 Haiku

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Gemini 1.5 Pro

Proprietary

Closed source

Claude 3.5 Haiku

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 1.5 Pro was released on 2024-05-01, while Claude 3.5 Haiku was released on 2024-10-22.

Claude 3.5 Haiku is 6 months newer than Gemini 1.5 Pro.

Gemini 1.5 Pro

May 1, 2024

1.9 years ago

Claude 3.5 Haiku

Oct 22, 2024

1.4 years ago

5mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemini 1.5 Pro has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2023-11-01, while Claude 3.5 Haiku's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemini 1.5 Pro's training data extends to 2023-11-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Claude 3.5 Haiku's cutoff date.

Gemini 1.5 Pro

Nov 2023

Claude 3.5 Haiku

—

Provider Availability

Gemini 1.5 Pro is available from Google. Claude 3.5 Haiku is available from Bedrock, Google, Anthropic.

Gemini 1.5 Pro

google logo
Google
Input Price:Input: $2.50/1MOutput Price:Output: $10.00/1M

Claude 3.5 Haiku

bedrock logo
AWS Bedrock
Input Price:Input: $0.80/1MOutput Price:Output: $4.00/1M
google logo
Google
Input Price:Input: $0.80/1MOutput Price:Output: $4.00/1M
anthropic logo
Anthropic
Input Price:Input: $1.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $5.00/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Google
Larger context window (2,097,152 tokens)
Supports multimodal inputs
Higher GPQA score (59.1% vs 41.6%)
Higher MATH score (86.5% vs 69.4%)
Higher MGSM score (87.5% vs 85.6%)
Higher MMLU-Pro score (75.8% vs 65.0%)
Anthropic
Less expensive input tokens
Less expensive output tokens
Higher DROP score (83.1% vs 74.9%)
Higher HumanEval score (88.1% vs 84.1%)

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Google
Gemini 1.5 Pro
Anthropic
Claude 3.5 Haiku

FAQ

Common questions about Gemini 1.5 Pro vs Claude 3.5 Haiku

Gemini 1.5 Pro shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks. Gemini 1.5 Pro is made by Google and Claude 3.5 Haiku is made by Anthropic. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.
Gemini 1.5 Pro scores XSTest: 98.8%, HellaSwag: 93.3%, GSM8k: 90.8%, BIG-Bench Hard: 89.2%, MGSM: 87.5%. Claude 3.5 Haiku scores HumanEval: 88.1%, MGSM: 85.6%, DROP: 83.1%, MATH: 69.4%, MMLU-Pro: 65.0%.
Claude 3.5 Haiku is 3.1x cheaper for input tokens. Gemini 1.5 Pro costs $2.50/M input and $10.00/M output via google. Claude 3.5 Haiku costs $0.80/M input and $4.00/M output via bedrock.
Gemini 1.5 Pro supports 2.1M tokens and Claude 3.5 Haiku supports 200K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.
Key differences include context window (2.1M vs 200K), input pricing ($2.50 vs $0.80/M), multimodal support (yes vs no). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.
Gemini 1.5 Pro is developed by Google and Claude 3.5 Haiku is developed by Anthropic.