Model Comparison

Gemini 1.5 Pro vs Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct

Gemini 1.5 Pro shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

3 benchmarks

Gemini 1.5 Pro outperforms in 2 benchmarks (HellaSwag, MMLU), while Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct is better at 1 benchmark (GSM8k).

Gemini 1.5 Pro shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

Fri Apr 10 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Cost data unavailable.

Lowest available price from all providers
Fri Apr 10 2026 • llm-stats.com
Google
Gemini 1.5 Pro
Input tokens$2.50
Output tokens$10.00
Best providerGoogle
NVIDIA
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
Input tokens$0.00
Output tokens$0.00
Best providerUnknown Organization
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Gemini 1.5 Pro specifies input context (2,097,152 tokens). Only Gemini 1.5 Pro specifies output context (8,192 tokens).

Google
Gemini 1.5 Pro
Input2,097,152 tokens
Output8,192 tokens
NVIDIA
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Fri Apr 10 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Gemini 1.5 Pro supports multimodal inputs, whereas Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct does not.

Gemini 1.5 Pro can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Gemini 1.5 Pro

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemini 1.5 Pro is licensed under a proprietary license, while Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct uses Llama 3.1 Community License.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemini 1.5 Pro

Proprietary

Closed source

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct

Llama 3.1 Community License

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 1.5 Pro was released on 2024-05-01, while Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct was released on 2024-10-01.

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct is 5 months newer than Gemini 1.5 Pro.

Gemini 1.5 Pro

May 1, 2024

1.9 years ago

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct

Oct 1, 2024

1.5 years ago

5mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemini 1.5 Pro has a knowledge cutoff of 2023-11-01, while Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct has a cutoff of 2023-12-01.

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct has more recent training data (up to 2023-12-01), making it potentially better informed about events through that date compared to Gemini 1.5 Pro (2023-11-01).

Gemini 1.5 Pro

Nov 2023

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct

Dec 2023

1 mo newer

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Google
Larger context window (2,097,152 tokens)
Supports multimodal inputs
Higher HellaSwag score (93.3% vs 85.6%)
Higher MMLU score (85.9% vs 80.2%)
NVIDIA
Has open weights
Higher GSM8k score (91.4% vs 90.8%)

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Google
Gemini 1.5 Pro
NVIDIA
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct

FAQ

Common questions about Gemini 1.5 Pro vs Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct

Gemini 1.5 Pro shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks. Gemini 1.5 Pro is made by Google and Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct is made by NVIDIA. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.
Gemini 1.5 Pro scores XSTest: 98.8%, HellaSwag: 93.3%, GSM8k: 90.8%, BIG-Bench Hard: 89.2%, MGSM: 87.5%. Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct scores GSM8k: 91.4%, HellaSwag: 85.6%, Winogrande: 84.5%, GSM8K Chat: 81.9%, MMLU Chat: 80.6%.
Gemini 1.5 Pro supports 2.1M tokens and Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.
Key differences include multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Proprietary vs Llama 3.1 Community License). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.
Gemini 1.5 Pro is developed by Google and Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct is developed by NVIDIA.