Gemini 1.5 Pro vs QwQ-32B-Preview
Gemini 1.5 Pro and QwQ-32B-Preview are closely matched at 12.1 and 9.2 on the LLM Stats Score. QwQ-32B-Preview is 26.9x cheaper per token.
Google · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026
Which is better?
Gemini 1.5 Pro and QwQ-32B-Preview are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at 12.1 and 9.2.
In the 1 individual benchmarks reported for both models, QwQ-32B-Preview wins 1; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.
On price, QwQ-32B-Preview is roughly 26.9x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.
Gemini 1.5 Pro also accepts a larger context window (2,097,152 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.
Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.
Choose Gemini 1.5 Pro
- you process long inputs — it offers a 2,097,152 token context window
Choose QwQ-32B-Preview
- you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 1 of 1 exact shared results
- cost matters — it's about 26.9x cheaper per token
- you want the most recent training data — it shipped Nov 2024
- you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune
At a glance
The differences that matter most.
Capability indexes
Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks
Individual benchmarks
23 reported for Gemini 1.5 Pro · 4 for QwQ-32B-Preview
Gemini 1.5 Pro outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while QwQ-32B-Preview is better at 1 benchmark (GPQA).
QwQ-32B-Preview significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.
Human preference
Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
For input processing, Gemini 1.5 Pro ($2.50/1M tokens) is 16.7x more expensive than QwQ-32B-Preview ($0.15/1M tokens).
For output processing, Gemini 1.5 Pro ($10.00/1M tokens) is 50.0x more expensive than QwQ-32B-Preview ($0.20/1M tokens).
In conclusion, Gemini 1.5 Pro is more expensive than QwQ-32B-Preview.*
* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
Gemini 1.5 Pro accepts 2,097,152 input tokens compared to QwQ-32B-Preview's 32,768 tokens. QwQ-32B-Preview can generate longer responses up to 32,768 tokens, while Gemini 1.5 Pro is limited to 8,192 tokens.
Input capabilities
Documented input modalities across available providers
Gemini 1.5 Pro supports multimodal inputs, whereas QwQ-32B-Preview does not.
Gemini 1.5 Pro can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.
Gemini 1.5 Pro
QwQ-32B-Preview
License
Usage and distribution terms
Gemini 1.5 Pro is licensed under a proprietary license, while QwQ-32B-Preview uses Apache 2.0.
License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.
Proprietary
Closed source
Apache 2.0
Open weights
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
Gemini 1.5 Pro was released on 2024-05-01, while QwQ-32B-Preview was released on 2024-11-28.
QwQ-32B-Preview is 7 months newer than Gemini 1.5 Pro.
May 1, 2024
2.4 years ago
Nov 28, 2024
1.8 years ago
7mo newerKnowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Gemini 1.5 Pro has a knowledge cutoff of 2023-11-01, while QwQ-32B-Preview has a cutoff of 2024-11-28.
QwQ-32B-Preview has more recent training data (up to 2024-11-28), making it potentially better informed about events through that date compared to Gemini 1.5 Pro (2023-11-01).
Nov 2023
Nov 2024
1 yr newerProvider Availability
Gemini 1.5 Pro is available from Google. QwQ-32B-Preview is available from DeepInfra, Hyperbolic, Fireworks, Together.
Gemini 1.5 Pro
QwQ-32B-Preview
Outputs Comparison
Judge for yourself.
Run your own prompts against Gemini 1.5 Pro and QwQ-32B-Preview side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.
FAQ
Common questions about Gemini 1.5 Pro vs QwQ-32B-Preview.