The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite vs IBM Granite 4.2 3B

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite and IBM Granite 4.2 3B are closely matched at 12.5 and 15.6 on the LLM Stats Score.

Google · IBM · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite and IBM Granite 4.2 3B are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at 12.5 and 15.6.

The models split the 2 individual benchmarks reported for both models evenly.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite

  • you want predictable pricing at $0.07/M input and $0.30/M output

Choose IBM Granite 4.2 3B

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Aug 2026
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
Google
IBM Granite 4.2 3B
IBM
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
12.5
#235
15.6
#213
Reasoning
12.7
#228
12.0
#234
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
1 of 2
1 of 2
Input price
$0.07 / M
— / M
Output price
$0.30 / M
— / M
Context window
1,048,576
—

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

2 shared
Index
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
IBM Granite 4.2 3B
Math
18.4#169
13.7#216
Long context
-1.8#107
-2.2#108
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

13 reported for Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite · 13 for IBM Granite 4.2 3B

2 shared

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite outperforms in 1 benchmarks (MMLU-Pro), while IBM Granite 4.2 3B is better at 1 benchmark (GPQA).

Both models are evenly matched across the benchmarks.

Tue Sep 01 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite specifies input context (1,048,576 tokens). Only Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite specifies output context (8,192 tokens).

Google
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output8,192 tokens
IBM
IBM Granite 4.2 3B
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Tue Sep 01 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite supports multimodal inputs, whereas IBM Granite 4.2 3B does not.

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite

Text
Images
Audio
Video

IBM Granite 4.2 3B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite is licensed under a proprietary license, while IBM Granite 4.2 3B uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite

Proprietary

Closed source

IBM Granite 4.2 3B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite was released on 2025-02-05, while IBM Granite 4.2 3B was released on 2026-08-25.

IBM Granite 4.2 3B is 19 months newer than Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite.

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite

Feb 5, 2025

1.6 years ago

IBM Granite 4.2 3B

Aug 25, 2026

1 weeks ago

1.6yr newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-06-01, while IBM Granite 4.2 3B's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite's training data extends to 2024-06-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without IBM Granite 4.2 3B's cutoff date.

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite

Jun 2024

IBM Granite 4.2 3B

—

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite and IBM Granite 4.2 3B side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
✓ Preferred
IBM Granite 4.2 3B
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite vs IBM Granite 4.2 3B.

Which is better, Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite or IBM Granite 4.2 3B?

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite and IBM Granite 4.2 3B are closely matched on the LLM Stats Score at 12.5 and 15.6. Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite is made by Google and IBM Granite 4.2 3B is made by IBM. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite compare to IBM Granite 4.2 3B in benchmarks?

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite scores MATH: 86.8%, FACTS Grounding: 83.6%, Global-MMLU-Lite: 78.2%, MMLU-Pro: 71.6%, MMMU: 68.0%. IBM Granite 4.2 3B scores AIME 2025: 78.3%, IFBench: 74.3%, LiveCodeBench v6: 69.7%, MMLU-Pro: 67.8%, RULER 64k: 67.5%.

What are the context window sizes for Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite and IBM Granite 4.2 3B?

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite supports 1.0M tokens and IBM Granite 4.2 3B supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite and IBM Granite 4.2 3B?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (12.5 vs 15.6), multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite and IBM Granite 4.2 3B?

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite is developed by Google and IBM Granite 4.2 3B is developed by IBM.

Related comparisons