The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

IBM Granite 4.2 3B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next

Qwen3.8-Flash-Next leads the LLM Stats Score 49.7 to 15.6.

IBM · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Qwen3.8-Flash-Next leads the overall LLM Stats Score 49.7 to 15.6, ranking #15 overall.

In the 3 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Qwen3.8-Flash-Next wins 3; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose IBM Granite 4.2 3B

  • you are already invested in the IBM ecosystem

Choose Qwen3.8-Flash-Next

  • overall performance matters — it scores 49.7 and ranks #15 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 3 of 3 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Aug 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
15.6
#213
49.7
#15
12.0
#234
49.3
#15
-6.7
#247
36.6
#18
2.0
#152
35.5
#13
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
0 of 3
3 of 3
Input price
— / M
— / M
Output price
— / M
— / M
Context window

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

2 shared
Index
IBM Granite 4.2 3B
Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
13.7#216
32.7#53
5.3#144
31.6#9
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

13 reported for IBM Granite 4.2 3B · 22 for Qwen3.8-Flash-Next

3 shared

IBM Granite 4.2 3B outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Qwen3.8-Flash-Next is better at 3 benchmarks (GPQA, IFBench, LiveCodeBench v6).

Qwen3.8-Flash-Next significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Mon Aug 31 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

122.0B diff

Qwen3.8-Flash-Next has 122.0B more parameters than IBM Granite 4.2 3B, making it 4066.7% larger.

IBM
IBM Granite 4.2 3B
3.0Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
125.0Bparameters
3.0B
IBM Granite 4.2 3B
125.0B
Qwen3.8-Flash-Next

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Qwen3.8-Flash-Next supports multimodal inputs, whereas IBM Granite 4.2 3B does not.

Qwen3.8-Flash-Next can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

IBM Granite 4.2 3B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen3.8-Flash-Next

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

IBM Granite 4.2 3B is licensed under Apache 2.0, while Qwen3.8-Flash-Next uses Qwen Community License 1.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

IBM Granite 4.2 3B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Qwen3.8-Flash-Next

Qwen Community License 1.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

IBM Granite 4.2 3B was released on 2026-08-25, while Qwen3.8-Flash-Next was released on 2026-08-26.

Qwen3.8-Flash-Next is 0 month newer than IBM Granite 4.2 3B.

IBM Granite 4.2 3B

Aug 25, 2026

6 days ago

Qwen3.8-Flash-Next

Aug 26, 2026

5 days ago

1d newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against IBM Granite 4.2 3B and Qwen3.8-Flash-Next side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

IBM Granite 4.2 3B
✓ Preferred
Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about IBM Granite 4.2 3B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next.

Which is better, IBM Granite 4.2 3B or Qwen3.8-Flash-Next?

Qwen3.8-Flash-Next leads the LLM Stats Score 49.7 to 15.6. IBM Granite 4.2 3B is made by IBM and Qwen3.8-Flash-Next is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does IBM Granite 4.2 3B compare to Qwen3.8-Flash-Next in benchmarks?

IBM Granite 4.2 3B scores AIME 2025: 78.3%, IFBench: 74.3%, LiveCodeBench v6: 69.7%, MMLU-Pro: 67.8%, RULER 64k: 67.5%. Qwen3.8-Flash-Next scores MathVision: 95.7%, LiveCodeBench v6: 91.9%, GPQA: 91.7%, CharXiv-R: 90.6%, RealWorldQA: 88.5%.

What are the main differences between IBM Granite 4.2 3B and Qwen3.8-Flash-Next?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (15.6 vs 49.7), multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (Apache 2.0 vs Qwen Community License 1.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes IBM Granite 4.2 3B and Qwen3.8-Flash-Next?

IBM Granite 4.2 3B is developed by IBM and Qwen3.8-Flash-Next is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.