Model Comparison

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking vs Claude 3.7 Sonnet

Claude 3.7 Sonnet shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

3 benchmarks

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking outperforms in 1 benchmarks (MMMU), while Claude 3.7 Sonnet is better at 2 benchmarks (AIME 2024, GPQA).

Claude 3.7 Sonnet shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

Thu Apr 02 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Cost data unavailable.

Lowest available price from all providers
Thu Apr 02 2026 • llm-stats.com
Google
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking
Input tokens$0.00
Output tokens$0.00
Best providerUnknown Organization
Anthropic
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Input tokens$3.00
Output tokens$15.00
Best providerAnthropic
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Claude 3.7 Sonnet specifies input context (200,000 tokens). Only Claude 3.7 Sonnet specifies output context (128,000 tokens).

Google
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Anthropic
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Input200,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Thu Apr 02 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Both Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking and Claude 3.7 Sonnet support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Claude 3.7 Sonnet

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking

Proprietary

Closed source

Claude 3.7 Sonnet

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking was released on 2025-01-21, while Claude 3.7 Sonnet was released on 2025-02-24.

Claude 3.7 Sonnet is 1 month newer than Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking.

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking

Jan 21, 2025

1.2 years ago

Claude 3.7 Sonnet

Feb 24, 2025

1.1 years ago

1mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-08-01, while Claude 3.7 Sonnet's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking's training data extends to 2024-08-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Claude 3.7 Sonnet's cutoff date.

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking

Aug 2024

Claude 3.7 Sonnet

—

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Google
Higher MMMU score (75.4% vs 75.0%)
Anthropic
Larger context window (200,000 tokens)
Higher AIME 2024 score (80.0% vs 73.3%)
Higher GPQA score (84.8% vs 74.2%)
GoogleGemini 2.0 Flash Thinking
AnthropicClaude 3.7 Sonnet
Compare in Playground

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Google
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking
Anthropic
Claude 3.7 Sonnet

FAQ

Common questions about Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking vs Claude 3.7 Sonnet

Claude 3.7 Sonnet shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks. Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking is made by Google and Claude 3.7 Sonnet is made by Anthropic. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking scores MMMU: 75.4%, GPQA: 74.2%, AIME 2024: 73.3%. Claude 3.7 Sonnet scores MATH-500: 96.2%, IFEval: 93.2%, MMMLU: 86.1%, GPQA: 84.8%, TAU-bench Retail: 81.2%.
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking supports an unknown number of tokens and Claude 3.7 Sonnet supports 200K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking is developed by Google and Claude 3.7 Sonnet is developed by Anthropic.