Model Comparison

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking vs GPT-4o

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

3 benchmarks

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking outperforms in 3 benchmarks (AIME 2024, GPQA, MMMU), while GPT-4o is better at 0 benchmarks.

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Fri Mar 27 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Cost data unavailable.

Lowest available price from all providers
Fri Mar 27 2026 • llm-stats.com
Google
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking
Input tokens$0.00
Output tokens$0.00
Best providerUnknown Organization
OpenAI
GPT-4o
Input tokens$2.50
Output tokens$10.00
Best providerAzure
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only GPT-4o specifies input context (128,000 tokens). Only GPT-4o specifies output context (16,384 tokens).

Google
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
OpenAI
GPT-4o
Input128,000 tokens
Output16,384 tokens
Fri Mar 27 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Both Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking and GPT-4o support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking

Text
Images
Audio
Video

GPT-4o

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking

Proprietary

Closed source

GPT-4o

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking was released on 2025-01-21, while GPT-4o was released on 2024-08-06.

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking is 6 months newer than GPT-4o.

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking

Jan 21, 2025

1.2 years ago

5mo newer
GPT-4o

Aug 6, 2024

1.6 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-08-01, while GPT-4o's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking's training data extends to 2024-08-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without GPT-4o's cutoff date.

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking

Aug 2024

GPT-4o

—

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Google
Higher AIME 2024 score (73.3% vs 13.1%)
Higher GPQA score (74.2% vs 70.1%)
Higher MMMU score (75.4% vs 72.2%)
OpenAI
Larger context window (128,000 tokens)

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Google
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking
OpenAI
GPT-4o

FAQ

Common questions about Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking vs GPT-4o

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking is made by Google and GPT-4o is made by OpenAI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking scores MMMU: 75.4%, GPQA: 74.2%, AIME 2024: 73.3%. GPT-4o scores AI2D: 94.2%, DocVQA: 92.8%, ChartQA: 85.7%, MMLU: 85.7%, CharXiv-D: 85.3%.
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking supports an unknown number of tokens and GPT-4o supports 128K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking is developed by Google and GPT-4o is developed by OpenAI.