The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking vs Grok-3

Grok-3 leads the LLM Stats Score 30.4 to 16.7.

Google · xAI · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Grok-3 leads the overall LLM Stats Score 30.4 to 16.7, ranking #124 overall.

In the 3 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Grok-3 wins 3; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking

  • you are already invested in the Google ecosystem

Choose Grok-3

  • overall performance matters — it scores 30.4 and ranks #124 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 3 of 3 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Feb 2025

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
16.7
#225
30.4
#124
17.0
#218
30.1
#123
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
0 of 3
3 of 3
Input price
— / M
$3.00 / M
Output price
— / M
$15.00 / M
Context window
—
128,000

Individual benchmarks

3 reported for Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking · 5 for Grok-3

3 shared

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Grok-3 is better at 3 benchmarks (AIME 2024, GPQA, MMMU).

Grok-3 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Sun Sep 27 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Grok-3 specifies input context (128,000 tokens). Only Grok-3 specifies output context (8,000 tokens).

Google
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
xAI
Grok-3
Input128,000 tokens
Output8,000 tokens
Sun Sep 27 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking and Grok-3 support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Grok-3

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking

Proprietary

Closed source

Grok-3

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking was released on 2025-01-21, while Grok-3 was released on 2025-02-17.

Grok-3 is 1 month newer than Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking.

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking

Jan 21, 2025

1.7 years ago

Grok-3

Feb 17, 2025

1.6 years ago

3w newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking has a knowledge cutoff of 2024-08-01, while Grok-3 has a cutoff of 2024-11-17.

Grok-3 has more recent training data (up to 2024-11-17), making it potentially better informed about events through that date compared to Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking (2024-08-01).

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking

Aug 2024

Grok-3

Nov 2024

3 mo newer

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking and Grok-3 side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking
✓ Preferred
Grok-3
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking vs Grok-3.

Which is better, Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking or Grok-3?

Grok-3 leads the LLM Stats Score 30.4 to 16.7. Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking is made by Google and Grok-3 is made by xAI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking compare to Grok-3 in benchmarks?

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking scores MMMU: 75.4%, GPQA: 74.2%, AIME 2024: 73.3%. Grok-3 scores AIME 2024: 93.3%, AIME 2025: 93.3%, GPQA: 84.6%, LiveCodeBench: 79.4%, MMMU: 78.0%.

What are the context window sizes for Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking and Grok-3?

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking supports an unknown number of tokens and Grok-3 supports 128K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking and Grok-3?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (16.7 vs 30.4). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking and Grok-3?

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking is developed by Google and Grok-3 is developed by xAI.