Model Comparison

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking vs Hy3Which is better in 2026?

Hy3 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Verdict: Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking vs Hy3 — which is better?

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking (by Google) and Hy3 (by Tencent) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Hy3 is better at 1 benchmark (GPQA). Hy3 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Choose Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking if…

  • you are already invested in the Google ecosystem

Choose Hy3 if…

  • you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 1 of 1 shared benchmarks
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Jul 2026
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

1 benchmarks

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Hy3 is better at 1 benchmark (GPQA).

Hy3 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Sun Jul 19 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking supports multimodal inputs, whereas Hy3 does not.

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Hy3

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking is licensed under a proprietary license, while Hy3 uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking

Proprietary

Closed source

Hy3

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking was released on 2025-01-21, while Hy3 was released on 2026-07-06.

Hy3 is 18 months newer than Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking.

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking

Jan 21, 2025

1.5 years ago

Hy3

Jul 6, 2026

1 weeks ago

1.5yr newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-08-01, while Hy3's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking's training data extends to 2024-08-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Hy3's cutoff date.

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking

Aug 2024

Hy3

—

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Google
Supports multimodal inputs
Tencent
Has open weights
Higher GPQA score (90.4% vs 74.2%)

Detailed Comparison

Interactive Arena

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking and Hy3 side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking
✓ Preferred
Hy3
Open in Playground
AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Google
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking
Tencent
Hy3

FAQ

Common questions about Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking vs Hy3.

Which is better, Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking or Hy3?

Hy3 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking is made by Google and Hy3 is made by Tencent. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking compare to Hy3 in benchmarks?

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking scores MMMU: 75.4%, GPQA: 74.2%, AIME 2024: 73.3%. Hy3 scores DeepSearchQA: 91.0%, GPQA: 90.4%, IMO-AnswerBench: 90.0%, BrowseComp: 84.2%, MCP Atlas: 79.1%.

What are the main differences between Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking and Hy3?

Key differences include multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking and Hy3?

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking is developed by Google and Hy3 is developed by Tencent.

Related comparisons