The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Hy3 vs Kimi K3

Kimi K3 leads the LLM Stats Score 53.8 to 42.9.

Tencent · Moonshot AI · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Kimi K3 leads the overall LLM Stats Score 53.8 to 42.9, ranking #8 overall.

In the 8 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Kimi K3 wins 8; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Hy3

  • you are already invested in the Tencent ecosystem

Choose Kimi K3

  • overall performance matters — it scores 53.8 and ranks #8 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 8 of 8 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Jul 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
42.9
#42
53.8
#8
43.0
#40
52.6
#8
32.8
#35
43.4
#5
26.6
#42
39.1
#8
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
0 of 8
8 of 8
Input price
— / M
$3.00 / M
Output price
— / M
$15.00 / M
Context window
1,048,576

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

3 shared
Index
Hy3
Kimi K3
35.6#41
40.6#11
21.5#50
34.1#3
24.7#12
33.9#1
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

31 reported for Hy3 · 31 for Kimi K3

8 shared

Hy3 outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Kimi K3 is better at 8 benchmarks (APEX-Agents, BrowseComp, DeepSearchQA, DeepSWE, GPQA, MCP Atlas, Terminal-Bench 2.1, Toolathlon).

Kimi K3 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Sun Sep 06 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

2505.0B diff

Kimi K3 has 2505.0B more parameters than Hy3, making it 849.2% larger.

Tencent
Hy3
295.0Bparameters
Moonshot AI
Kimi K3
2.8Tparameters
295.0B
Hy3
2800.0B
Kimi K3

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Kimi K3 specifies input context (1,048,576 tokens). Only Kimi K3 specifies output context (1,048,576 tokens).

Tencent
Hy3
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Moonshot AI
Kimi K3
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output1,048,576 tokens
Sun Sep 06 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Kimi K3 supports multimodal inputs, whereas Hy3 does not.

Kimi K3 can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Hy3

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Kimi K3

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Hy3 is licensed under Apache 2.0, while Kimi K3 uses Kimi K3 License.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Hy3

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Kimi K3

Kimi K3 License

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Hy3 was released on 2026-07-06, while Kimi K3 was released on 2026-07-16.

Kimi K3 is 0 month newer than Hy3.

Hy3

Jul 6, 2026

2 months ago

Kimi K3

Jul 16, 2026

1 months ago

1w newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Hy3 and Kimi K3 side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Hy3
✓ Preferred
Kimi K3
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Hy3 vs Kimi K3.

Which is better, Hy3 or Kimi K3?

Kimi K3 leads the LLM Stats Score 53.8 to 42.9. Hy3 is made by Tencent and Kimi K3 is made by Moonshot AI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Hy3 compare to Kimi K3 in benchmarks?

Hy3 scores DeepSearchQA: 91.0%, GPQA: 90.4%, IMO-AnswerBench: 90.0%, BrowseComp: 84.2%, MCP Atlas: 79.1%. Kimi K3 scores MathVision: 97.8%, DeepSearchQA: 95.0%, GPQA: 93.5%, CharXiv-R: 91.3%, BrowseComp: 91.2%.

What are the context window sizes for Hy3 and Kimi K3?

Hy3 supports an unknown number of tokens and Kimi K3 supports 1.0M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Hy3 and Kimi K3?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (42.9 vs 53.8), multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (Apache 2.0 vs Kimi K3 License). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Hy3 and Kimi K3?

Hy3 is developed by Tencent and Kimi K3 is developed by Moonshot AI.