The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking vs Nova Pro

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking leads the LLM Stats Score 17.0 to 12.8.

Google · Amazon · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking leads the overall LLM Stats Score 17.0 to 12.8, ranking #198 overall.

In the 2 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking wins 2; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking

  • overall performance matters — it scores 17.0 and ranks #198 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 2 of 2 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Jan 2025

Choose Nova Pro

  • you want predictable pricing at $0.80/M input and $3.20/M output

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking
Google
Nova Pro
Amazon
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
17.0
#198
12.8
#229
Reasoning
17.3
#192
12.5
#227
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
2 of 2
0 of 2
Input price
— / M
$0.80 / M
Output price
— / M
$3.20 / M
Context window
—
300,000

Individual benchmarks

3 reported for Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking · 27 for Nova Pro

2 shared

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking outperforms in 2 benchmarks (GPQA, MMMU), while Nova Pro is better at 0 benchmarks.

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Sat Aug 29 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Nova Pro specifies input context (300,000 tokens). Only Nova Pro specifies output context (300,000 tokens).

Google
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Amazon
Nova Pro
Input300,000 tokens
Output300,000 tokens
Sat Aug 29 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking and Nova Pro support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Nova Pro

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking

Proprietary

Closed source

Nova Pro

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking was released on 2025-01-21, while Nova Pro was released on 2024-11-20.

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking is 2 months newer than Nova Pro.

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking

Jan 21, 2025

1.6 years ago

2mo newer
Nova Pro

Nov 20, 2024

1.8 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-08-01, while Nova Pro's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking's training data extends to 2024-08-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Nova Pro's cutoff date.

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking

Aug 2024

Nova Pro

—

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking and Nova Pro side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking
✓ Preferred
Nova Pro
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking vs Nova Pro.

Which is better, Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking or Nova Pro?

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking leads the LLM Stats Score 17.0 to 12.8. Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking is made by Google and Nova Pro is made by Amazon. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking compare to Nova Pro in benchmarks?

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking scores MMMU: 75.4%, GPQA: 74.2%, AIME 2024: 73.3%. Nova Pro scores ARC-C: 94.8%, GSM8k: 94.8%, DocVQA: 93.5%, IFEval: 92.1%, ChartQA: 89.2%.

What are the context window sizes for Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking and Nova Pro?

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking supports an unknown number of tokens and Nova Pro supports 300K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking and Nova Pro?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (17.0 vs 12.8). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking and Nova Pro?

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking is developed by Google and Nova Pro is developed by Amazon.

Related comparisons