Model Comparison

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking vs o1

o1 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

3 benchmarks

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while o1 is better at 3 benchmarks (AIME 2024, GPQA, MMMU).

o1 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Sun Mar 29 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Cost data unavailable.

Lowest available price from all providers
Sun Mar 29 2026 • llm-stats.com
Google
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking
Input tokens$0.00
Output tokens$0.00
Best providerUnknown Organization
OpenAI
o1
Input tokens$15.00
Output tokens$60.00
Best providerAzure
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only o1 specifies input context (200,000 tokens). Only o1 specifies output context (100,000 tokens).

Google
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
OpenAI
o1
Input200,000 tokens
Output100,000 tokens
Sun Mar 29 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking supports multimodal inputs, whereas o1 does not.

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking

Text
Images
Audio
Video

o1

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking

Proprietary

Closed source

o1

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking was released on 2025-01-21, while o1 was released on 2024-12-17.

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking is 1 month newer than o1.

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking

Jan 21, 2025

1.2 years ago

1mo newer
o1

Dec 17, 2024

1.3 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-08-01, while o1's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking's training data extends to 2024-08-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without o1's cutoff date.

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking

Aug 2024

o1

—

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Google
Supports multimodal inputs
OpenAI
Larger context window (200,000 tokens)
Higher AIME 2024 score (74.3% vs 73.3%)
Higher GPQA score (78.0% vs 74.2%)
Higher MMMU score (77.6% vs 75.4%)

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Google
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking
OpenAI
o1

FAQ

Common questions about Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking vs o1

o1 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking is made by Google and o1 is made by OpenAI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking scores MMMU: 75.4%, GPQA: 74.2%, AIME 2024: 73.3%. o1 scores GSM8k: 97.1%, MATH: 96.4%, GPQA Physics: 92.8%, MMLU: 91.8%, MGSM: 89.3%.
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking supports an unknown number of tokens and o1 supports 200K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.
Key differences include multimodal support (yes vs no). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking is developed by Google and o1 is developed by OpenAI.