The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking vs o1

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking and o1 are closely matched at 16.7 and 20.9 on the LLM Stats Score.

Google · OpenAI · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking and o1 are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at 16.7 and 20.9.

In the 3 individual benchmarks reported for both models, o1 wins 3; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Jan 2025

Choose o1

  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 3 of 3 exact shared results

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
16.7
#225
20.9
#197
17.0
#218
21.3
#187
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
0 of 3
3 of 3
Input price
— / M
$15.00 / M
Output price
— / M
$60.00 / M
Context window
—
200,000

Individual benchmarks

3 reported for Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking · 19 for o1

3 shared

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while o1 is better at 3 benchmarks (AIME 2024, GPQA, MMMU).

o1 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Fri Sep 25 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only o1 specifies input context (200,000 tokens). Only o1 specifies output context (100,000 tokens).

Google
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
OpenAI
o1
Input200,000 tokens
Output100,000 tokens
Fri Sep 25 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking supports multimodal inputs, whereas o1 does not.

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking

Text
Images
Audio
Video

o1

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking

Proprietary

Closed source

o1

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking was released on 2025-01-21, while o1 was released on 2024-12-17.

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking is 1 month newer than o1.

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking

Jan 21, 2025

1.7 years ago

1mo newer
o1

Dec 17, 2024

1.8 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-08-01, while o1's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking's training data extends to 2024-08-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without o1's cutoff date.

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking

Aug 2024

o1

—

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking and o1 side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking
✓ Preferred
o1
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking vs o1.

Which is better, Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking or o1?

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking and o1 are closely matched on the LLM Stats Score at 16.7 and 20.9. Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking is made by Google and o1 is made by OpenAI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking compare to o1 in benchmarks?

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking scores MMMU: 75.4%, GPQA: 74.2%, AIME 2024: 73.3%. o1 scores GSM8k: 97.1%, MATH: 96.4%, GPQA Physics: 92.8%, MMLU: 91.8%, MGSM: 89.3%.

What are the context window sizes for Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking and o1?

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking supports an unknown number of tokens and o1 supports 200K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking and o1?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (16.7 vs 20.9), multimodal support (yes vs no). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking and o1?

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking is developed by Google and o1 is developed by OpenAI.