Model Comparison

Gemini 2.0 Flash vs Gemini 1.0 Pro

Gemini 2.0 Flash significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Gemini 2.0 Flash is 4.3x cheaper per token.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

4 benchmarks

Gemini 2.0 Flash outperforms in 4 benchmarks (EgoSchema, GPQA, MATH, MMMU), while Gemini 1.0 Pro is better at 0 benchmarks.

Gemini 2.0 Flash significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Wed Apr 08 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Gemini 2.0 Flash costs less

For input processing, Gemini 2.0 Flash ($0.10/1M tokens) is 5.0x cheaper than Gemini 1.0 Pro ($0.50/1M tokens).

For output processing, Gemini 2.0 Flash ($0.40/1M tokens) is 3.8x cheaper than Gemini 1.0 Pro ($1.50/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Gemini 1.0 Pro is more expensive than Gemini 2.0 Flash.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Wed Apr 08 2026 • llm-stats.com
Google
Gemini 2.0 Flash
Input tokens$0.10
Output tokens$0.40
Best providerGoogle
Google
Gemini 1.0 Pro
Input tokens$0.50
Output tokens$1.50
Best providerGoogle
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Gemini 2.0 Flash accepts 1,048,576 input tokens compared to Gemini 1.0 Pro's 32,760 tokens. Both models can generate responses up to 8,192 tokens.

Google
Gemini 2.0 Flash
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output8,192 tokens
Google
Gemini 1.0 Pro
Input32,760 tokens
Output8,192 tokens
Wed Apr 08 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Gemini 2.0 Flash supports multimodal inputs, whereas Gemini 1.0 Pro does not.

Gemini 2.0 Flash can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Gemini 2.0 Flash

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Gemini 1.0 Pro

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Gemini 2.0 Flash

Proprietary

Closed source

Gemini 1.0 Pro

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 2.0 Flash was released on 2024-12-01, while Gemini 1.0 Pro was released on 2024-02-15.

Gemini 2.0 Flash is 10 months newer than Gemini 1.0 Pro.

Gemini 2.0 Flash

Dec 1, 2024

1.4 years ago

9mo newer
Gemini 1.0 Pro

Feb 15, 2024

2.1 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemini 2.0 Flash has a knowledge cutoff of 2024-08-01, while Gemini 1.0 Pro has a cutoff of 2024-02-01.

Gemini 2.0 Flash has more recent training data (up to 2024-08-01), making it potentially better informed about events through that date compared to Gemini 1.0 Pro (2024-02-01).

Gemini 2.0 Flash

Aug 2024

6 mo newer
Gemini 1.0 Pro

Feb 2024

Provider Availability

Gemini 2.0 Flash is available from Google. Gemini 1.0 Pro is available from Google.

Gemini 2.0 Flash

google logo
Google
Input Price:Input: $0.10/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.40/1M

Gemini 1.0 Pro

google logo
Google
Input Price:Input: $0.50/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.50/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Google
Larger context window (1,048,576 tokens)
Supports multimodal inputs
Less expensive input tokens
Less expensive output tokens
Higher EgoSchema score (71.5% vs 55.7%)
Higher GPQA score (62.1% vs 27.9%)
Higher MATH score (89.7% vs 32.6%)
Higher MMMU score (70.7% vs 47.9%)
Google
GoogleGemini 2.0 Flash
GoogleGemini 1.0 Pro
Compare in Playground

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Google
Gemini 2.0 Flash
Google
Gemini 1.0 Pro

FAQ

Common questions about Gemini 2.0 Flash vs Gemini 1.0 Pro

Gemini 2.0 Flash significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Gemini 2.0 Flash is made by Google and Gemini 1.0 Pro is made by Google. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.
Gemini 2.0 Flash scores Natural2Code: 92.9%, MATH: 89.7%, FACTS Grounding: 83.6%, MMLU-Pro: 76.4%, EgoSchema: 71.5%. Gemini 1.0 Pro scores BIG-Bench: 75.0%, MMLU: 71.8%, WMT23: 71.7%, EgoSchema: 55.7%, MMMU: 47.9%.
Gemini 2.0 Flash is 5.0x cheaper for input tokens. Gemini 2.0 Flash costs $0.10/M input and $0.40/M output via google. Gemini 1.0 Pro costs $0.50/M input and $1.50/M output via google.
Gemini 2.0 Flash supports 1.0M tokens and Gemini 1.0 Pro supports 33K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.
Key differences include context window (1.0M vs 33K), input pricing ($0.10 vs $0.50/M), multimodal support (yes vs no). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.