Model Comparison

Gemini 2.0 Flash vs GPT-4o

GPT-4o shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks. Gemini 2.0 Flash is 25.0x cheaper per token.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

4 benchmarks

Gemini 2.0 Flash outperforms in 1 benchmarks (MMLU-Pro), while GPT-4o is better at 3 benchmarks (EgoSchema, GPQA, MMMU).

GPT-4o shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

Tue Apr 07 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Gemini 2.0 Flash costs less

For input processing, Gemini 2.0 Flash ($0.10/1M tokens) is 25.0x cheaper than GPT-4o ($2.50/1M tokens).

For output processing, Gemini 2.0 Flash ($0.40/1M tokens) is 25.0x cheaper than GPT-4o ($10.00/1M tokens).

In conclusion, GPT-4o is more expensive than Gemini 2.0 Flash.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Tue Apr 07 2026 • llm-stats.com
Google
Gemini 2.0 Flash
Input tokens$0.10
Output tokens$0.40
Best providerGoogle
OpenAI
GPT-4o
Input tokens$2.50
Output tokens$10.00
Best providerAzure
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Gemini 2.0 Flash accepts 1,048,576 input tokens compared to GPT-4o's 128,000 tokens. GPT-4o can generate longer responses up to 16,384 tokens, while Gemini 2.0 Flash is limited to 8,192 tokens.

Google
Gemini 2.0 Flash
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output8,192 tokens
OpenAI
GPT-4o
Input128,000 tokens
Output16,384 tokens
Tue Apr 07 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Both Gemini 2.0 Flash and GPT-4o support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Gemini 2.0 Flash

Text
Images
Audio
Video

GPT-4o

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Gemini 2.0 Flash

Proprietary

Closed source

GPT-4o

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 2.0 Flash was released on 2024-12-01, while GPT-4o was released on 2024-08-06.

Gemini 2.0 Flash is 4 months newer than GPT-4o.

Gemini 2.0 Flash

Dec 1, 2024

1.3 years ago

3mo newer
GPT-4o

Aug 6, 2024

1.7 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemini 2.0 Flash has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-08-01, while GPT-4o's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemini 2.0 Flash's training data extends to 2024-08-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without GPT-4o's cutoff date.

Gemini 2.0 Flash

Aug 2024

GPT-4o

—

Provider Availability

Gemini 2.0 Flash is available from Google. GPT-4o is available from Azure, OpenAI.

Gemini 2.0 Flash

google logo
Google
Input Price:Input: $0.10/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.40/1M

GPT-4o

azure logo
Azure
Input Price:Input: $2.50/1MOutput Price:Output: $10.00/1M
openai logo
OpenAI
Input Price:Input: $2.50/1MOutput Price:Output: $10.00/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Google
Larger context window (1,048,576 tokens)
Less expensive input tokens
Less expensive output tokens
Higher MMLU-Pro score (76.4% vs 74.7%)
OpenAI
Higher EgoSchema score (72.2% vs 71.5%)
Higher GPQA score (70.1% vs 62.1%)
Higher MMMU score (72.2% vs 70.7%)
GoogleGemini 2.0 Flash
OpenAIGPT-4o
Compare in Playground

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Google
Gemini 2.0 Flash
OpenAI
GPT-4o

FAQ

Common questions about Gemini 2.0 Flash vs GPT-4o

GPT-4o shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks. Gemini 2.0 Flash is made by Google and GPT-4o is made by OpenAI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.
Gemini 2.0 Flash scores Natural2Code: 92.9%, MATH: 89.7%, FACTS Grounding: 83.6%, MMLU-Pro: 76.4%, EgoSchema: 71.5%. GPT-4o scores AI2D: 94.2%, DocVQA: 92.8%, ChartQA: 85.7%, MMLU: 85.7%, CharXiv-D: 85.3%.
Gemini 2.0 Flash is 25.0x cheaper for input tokens. Gemini 2.0 Flash costs $0.10/M input and $0.40/M output via google. GPT-4o costs $2.50/M input and $10.00/M output via azure.
Gemini 2.0 Flash supports 1.0M tokens and GPT-4o supports 128K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.
Key differences include context window (1.0M vs 128K), input pricing ($0.10 vs $2.50/M). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.
Gemini 2.0 Flash is developed by Google and GPT-4o is developed by OpenAI.