Model Comparison

Gemini 2.0 Flash vs GPT-4o mini

Gemini 2.0 Flash significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Gemini 2.0 Flash is 1.5x cheaper per token.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

3 benchmarks

Gemini 2.0 Flash outperforms in 3 benchmarks (GPQA, MATH, MMMU), while GPT-4o mini is better at 0 benchmarks.

Gemini 2.0 Flash significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Fri Apr 17 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Gemini 2.0 Flash costs less

For input processing, Gemini 2.0 Flash ($0.10/1M tokens) is 1.5x cheaper than GPT-4o mini ($0.15/1M tokens).

For output processing, Gemini 2.0 Flash ($0.40/1M tokens) is 1.5x cheaper than GPT-4o mini ($0.60/1M tokens).

In conclusion, GPT-4o mini is more expensive than Gemini 2.0 Flash.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Fri Apr 17 2026 • llm-stats.com
Google
Gemini 2.0 Flash
Input tokens$0.10
Output tokens$0.40
Best providerGoogle
OpenAI
GPT-4o mini
Input tokens$0.15
Output tokens$0.60
Best providerAzure
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Gemini 2.0 Flash accepts 1,048,576 input tokens compared to GPT-4o mini's 128,000 tokens. GPT-4o mini can generate longer responses up to 16,384 tokens, while Gemini 2.0 Flash is limited to 8,192 tokens.

Google
Gemini 2.0 Flash
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output8,192 tokens
OpenAI
GPT-4o mini
Input128,000 tokens
Output16,384 tokens
Fri Apr 17 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Both Gemini 2.0 Flash and GPT-4o mini support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Gemini 2.0 Flash

Text
Images
Audio
Video

GPT-4o mini

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Gemini 2.0 Flash

Proprietary

Closed source

GPT-4o mini

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 2.0 Flash was released on 2024-12-01, while GPT-4o mini was released on 2024-07-18.

Gemini 2.0 Flash is 5 months newer than GPT-4o mini.

Gemini 2.0 Flash

Dec 1, 2024

1.4 years ago

4mo newer
GPT-4o mini

Jul 18, 2024

1.7 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemini 2.0 Flash has a knowledge cutoff of 2024-08-01, while GPT-4o mini has a cutoff of 2023-10-01.

Gemini 2.0 Flash has more recent training data (up to 2024-08-01), making it potentially better informed about events through that date compared to GPT-4o mini (2023-10-01).

Gemini 2.0 Flash

Aug 2024

10 mo newer
GPT-4o mini

Oct 2023

Provider Availability

Gemini 2.0 Flash is available from Google. GPT-4o mini is available from Azure.

Gemini 2.0 Flash

google logo
Google
Input Price:Input: $0.10/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.40/1M

GPT-4o mini

azure logo
Azure
Input Price:Input: $0.15/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.60/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Google
Larger context window (1,048,576 tokens)
Less expensive input tokens
Less expensive output tokens
Higher GPQA score (62.1% vs 40.2%)
Higher MATH score (89.7% vs 70.2%)
Higher MMMU score (70.7% vs 59.4%)
OpenAI
GoogleGemini 2.0 Flash
OpenAIGPT-4o mini
Compare in Playground

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Google
Gemini 2.0 Flash
OpenAI
GPT-4o mini

FAQ

Common questions about Gemini 2.0 Flash vs GPT-4o mini

Gemini 2.0 Flash significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Gemini 2.0 Flash is made by Google and GPT-4o mini is made by OpenAI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.
Gemini 2.0 Flash scores Natural2Code: 92.9%, MATH: 89.7%, FACTS Grounding: 83.6%, MMLU-Pro: 76.4%, EgoSchema: 71.5%. GPT-4o mini scores HumanEval: 87.2%, MGSM: 87.0%, MMLU: 82.0%, DROP: 79.7%, MATH: 70.2%.
Gemini 2.0 Flash is 1.5x cheaper for input tokens. Gemini 2.0 Flash costs $0.10/M input and $0.40/M output via google. GPT-4o mini costs $0.15/M input and $0.60/M output via azure.
Gemini 2.0 Flash supports 1.0M tokens and GPT-4o mini supports 128K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.
Key differences include context window (1.0M vs 128K), input pricing ($0.10 vs $0.15/M). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.
Gemini 2.0 Flash is developed by Google and GPT-4o mini is developed by OpenAI.