The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Gemini 2.0 Flash vs Mistral Large 3 (675B Instruct 2512 NVFP4)

Gemini 2.0 Flash and Mistral Large 3 (675B Instruct 2512 NVFP4) are closely matched at 16.5 and 8.9 on the LLM Stats Score.

Google · Mistral AI · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Gemini 2.0 Flash and Mistral Large 3 (675B Instruct 2512 NVFP4) are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at 16.5 and 8.9.

In the 2 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Gemini 2.0 Flash wins 2; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Gemini 2.0 Flash

  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 2 of 2 exact shared results

Choose Mistral Large 3 (675B Instruct 2512 NVFP4)

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Dec 2025
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Gemini 2.0 Flash
Google
Mistral Large 3 (675B Instruct 2512 NVFP4)
Mistral AI
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
16.5
#237
8.9
#290
Reasoning
15.8
#236
9.1
#283
Coding
1.6
#243
1.3
#246
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
2 of 2
0 of 2
Input price
$0.10 / M
— / M
Output price
$0.40 / M
— / M
Context window
1,048,576
—

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
Gemini 2.0 Flash
Mistral Large 3 (675B Instruct 2512 NVFP4)
Math
23.4#135
18.9#181
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

13 reported for Gemini 2.0 Flash · 5 for Mistral Large 3 (675B Instruct 2512 NVFP4)

2 shared

Gemini 2.0 Flash outperforms in 2 benchmarks (GPQA, LiveCodeBench), while Mistral Large 3 (675B Instruct 2512 NVFP4) is better at 0 benchmarks.

Gemini 2.0 Flash significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Thu Oct 08 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Gemini 2.0 Flash specifies input context (1,048,576 tokens). Only Gemini 2.0 Flash specifies output context (8,192 tokens).

Google
Gemini 2.0 Flash
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output8,192 tokens
Mistral AI
Mistral Large 3 (675B Instruct 2512 NVFP4)
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Thu Oct 08 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both Gemini 2.0 Flash and Mistral Large 3 (675B Instruct 2512 NVFP4) support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Gemini 2.0 Flash

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Mistral Large 3 (675B Instruct 2512 NVFP4)

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemini 2.0 Flash is licensed under a proprietary license, while Mistral Large 3 (675B Instruct 2512 NVFP4) uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemini 2.0 Flash

Proprietary

Closed source

Mistral Large 3 (675B Instruct 2512 NVFP4)

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 2.0 Flash was released on 2024-12-01, while Mistral Large 3 (675B Instruct 2512 NVFP4) was released on 2025-12-04.

Mistral Large 3 (675B Instruct 2512 NVFP4) is 12 months newer than Gemini 2.0 Flash.

Gemini 2.0 Flash

Dec 1, 2024

1.9 years ago

Mistral Large 3 (675B Instruct 2512 NVFP4)

Dec 4, 2025

10 months ago

1.0yr newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemini 2.0 Flash has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-08-01, while Mistral Large 3 (675B Instruct 2512 NVFP4)'s cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemini 2.0 Flash's training data extends to 2024-08-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Mistral Large 3 (675B Instruct 2512 NVFP4)'s cutoff date.

Gemini 2.0 Flash

Aug 2024

Mistral Large 3 (675B Instruct 2512 NVFP4)

—

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemini 2.0 Flash and Mistral Large 3 (675B Instruct 2512 NVFP4) side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemini 2.0 Flash
✓ Preferred
Mistral Large 3 (675B Instruct 2512 NVFP4)
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Gemini 2.0 Flash vs Mistral Large 3 (675B Instruct 2512 NVFP4).

Which is better, Gemini 2.0 Flash or Mistral Large 3 (675B Instruct 2512 NVFP4)?

Gemini 2.0 Flash and Mistral Large 3 (675B Instruct 2512 NVFP4) are closely matched on the LLM Stats Score at 16.5 and 8.9. Gemini 2.0 Flash is made by Google and Mistral Large 3 (675B Instruct 2512 NVFP4) is made by Mistral AI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Gemini 2.0 Flash compare to Mistral Large 3 (675B Instruct 2512 NVFP4) in benchmarks?

Gemini 2.0 Flash scores Natural2Code: 92.9%, MATH: 89.7%, FACTS Grounding: 83.6%, MMLU-Pro: 76.4%, EgoSchema: 71.5%. Mistral Large 3 (675B Instruct 2512 NVFP4) scores MMMLU: 85.5%, AMC_2022_23: 52.0%, GPQA: 43.9%, LiveCodeBench: 34.4%, SimpleQA: 23.8%.

What are the context window sizes for Gemini 2.0 Flash and Mistral Large 3 (675B Instruct 2512 NVFP4)?

Gemini 2.0 Flash supports 1.0M tokens and Mistral Large 3 (675B Instruct 2512 NVFP4) supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Gemini 2.0 Flash and Mistral Large 3 (675B Instruct 2512 NVFP4)?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (16.5 vs 8.9), licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemini 2.0 Flash and Mistral Large 3 (675B Instruct 2512 NVFP4)?

Gemini 2.0 Flash is developed by Google and Mistral Large 3 (675B Instruct 2512 NVFP4) is developed by Mistral AI.

Related comparisons