Gemini 2.5 Flash vs Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Comparison

Comparing Gemini 2.5 Flash and Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

10 benchmarks

Gemini 2.5 Flash outperforms in 10 benchmarks (Aider-Polyglot, AIME 2025, FACTS Grounding, Global-MMLU-Lite, GPQA, Humanity's Last Exam, MMMU, SimpleQA, SWE-Bench Verified, Vibe-Eval), while Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite is better at 0 benchmarks.

Gemini 2.5 Flash significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Sat Mar 14 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite costs less

For input processing, Gemini 2.5 Flash ($0.30/1M tokens) is 3.0x more expensive than Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite ($0.10/1M tokens).

For output processing, Gemini 2.5 Flash ($2.50/1M tokens) is 6.3x more expensive than Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite ($0.40/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Gemini 2.5 Flash is more expensive than Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Sat Mar 14 2026 • llm-stats.com
Google
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Input tokens$0.30
Output tokens$2.50
Best providerGoogle
Google
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Input tokens$0.10
Output tokens$0.40
Best providerGoogle
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Both models have the same input context window of 1,048,576 tokens. Both models can generate responses up to 65,536 tokens.

Google
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output65,536 tokens
Google
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output65,536 tokens
Sat Mar 14 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Both Gemini 2.5 Flash and Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Gemini 2.5 Flash

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemini 2.5 Flash is licensed under a proprietary license, while Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite uses Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemini 2.5 Flash

Proprietary

Closed source

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 2.5 Flash was released on 2025-05-20, while Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite was released on 2025-06-17.

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite is 1 month newer than Gemini 2.5 Flash.

Gemini 2.5 Flash

May 20, 2025

9 months ago

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Jun 17, 2025

9 months ago

4w newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemini 2.5 Flash has a knowledge cutoff of 2025-01-31, while Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite has a cutoff of 2025-01-01.

Gemini 2.5 Flash has more recent training data (up to 2025-01-31), making it potentially better informed about events through that date compared to Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite (2025-01-01).

Gemini 2.5 Flash

Jan 2025

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Jan 2025

Provider Availability

Gemini 2.5 Flash is available from Google. Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite is available from Google. The availability of providers can affect quality of the model and reliability.

Gemini 2.5 Flash

google logo
Google
Input Price:Input: $0.30/1MOutput Price:Output: $2.50/1M

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

google logo
Google
Input Price:Input: $0.10/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.40/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Key Takeaways

Higher Aider-Polyglot score (61.9% vs 26.7%)
Higher AIME 2025 score (72.0% vs 49.8%)
Higher FACTS Grounding score (85.3% vs 84.1%)
Higher Global-MMLU-Lite score (88.4% vs 81.1%)
Higher GPQA score (82.8% vs 64.6%)
Higher Humanity's Last Exam score (11.0% vs 5.1%)
Higher MMMU score (79.7% vs 72.9%)
Higher SimpleQA score (26.9% vs 10.7%)
Higher SWE-Bench Verified score (60.4% vs 31.6%)
Higher Vibe-Eval score (65.4% vs 51.3%)
Less expensive input tokens
Less expensive output tokens
Has open weights
GoogleGemini 2.5 Flash
GoogleGemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Google
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Google
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite