The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Gemini 2.5 Flash vs Ling 3.1 Flash

Ling 3.1 Flash leads the LLM Stats Score 51.0 to 21.7.

Google · InclusionAI · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Ling 3.1 Flash leads the overall LLM Stats Score 51.0 to 21.7, ranking #15 overall.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Gemini 2.5 Flash

  • you want predictable pricing at $0.30/M input and $2.50/M output

Choose Ling 3.1 Flash

  • overall performance matters — it scores 51.0 and ranks #15 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Gemini 2.5 Flash
Google
Ling 3.1 Flash
InclusionAI
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
21.7
#199
51.0
#15
Reasoning
21.4
#196
47.5
#26
Coding
8.3
#194
38.8
#18
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
$0.30 / M
— / M
Output price
$2.50 / M
— / M
Context window
1,000,000
—

Individual benchmarks

14 reported for Gemini 2.5 Flash · 11 for Ling 3.1 Flash

No common benchmarks found

Gemini 2.5 Flash and Ling 3.1 Flashdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Gemini 2.5 Flash specifies input context (1,000,000 tokens). Only Gemini 2.5 Flash specifies output context (1,000,000 tokens).

Google
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Input1,000,000 tokens
Output1,000,000 tokens
InclusionAI
Ling 3.1 Flash
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Thu Oct 08 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Gemini 2.5 Flash supports multimodal inputs, whereas Ling 3.1 Flash does not.

Gemini 2.5 Flash can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Gemini 2.5 Flash

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Ling 3.1 Flash

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 2.5 Flash was released on 2025-05-20, while Ling 3.1 Flash was released on 2026-09-30.

Ling 3.1 Flash is 17 months newer than Gemini 2.5 Flash.

Gemini 2.5 Flash

May 20, 2025

1.4 years ago

Ling 3.1 Flash

Sep 30, 2026

1 weeks ago

1.4yr newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemini 2.5 Flash has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2025-01-31, while Ling 3.1 Flash's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemini 2.5 Flash's training data extends to 2025-01-31, but cannot make a direct comparison without Ling 3.1 Flash's cutoff date.

Gemini 2.5 Flash

Jan 2025

Ling 3.1 Flash

—

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemini 2.5 Flash and Ling 3.1 Flash side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemini 2.5 Flash
✓ Preferred
Ling 3.1 Flash
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Gemini 2.5 Flash vs Ling 3.1 Flash.

Which is better, Gemini 2.5 Flash or Ling 3.1 Flash?

Ling 3.1 Flash leads the LLM Stats Score 51.0 to 21.7. Gemini 2.5 Flash is made by Google and Ling 3.1 Flash is made by InclusionAI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Gemini 2.5 Flash compare to Ling 3.1 Flash in benchmarks?

Gemini 2.5 Flash scores Global-MMLU-Lite: 88.4%, AIME 2024: 88.0%, FACTS Grounding: 85.3%, GPQA: 82.8%, MMMU: 79.7%. Ling 3.1 Flash scores CyberGym: 87.9%, DRACO: 85.5%, FrontierSWE: 75.2%, Multi-Challenge: 69.8%, SkillsBench: 68.7%.

What are the context window sizes for Gemini 2.5 Flash and Ling 3.1 Flash?

Gemini 2.5 Flash supports 1.0M tokens and Ling 3.1 Flash supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Gemini 2.5 Flash and Ling 3.1 Flash?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (21.7 vs 51.0), multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Proprietary vs Unknown). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemini 2.5 Flash and Ling 3.1 Flash?

Gemini 2.5 Flash is developed by Google and Ling 3.1 Flash is developed by InclusionAI.

Related comparisons