Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 vs Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1
Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 leads the LLM Stats Score 29.9 to 19.1.
Google · NVIDIA · Updated for 2026
Which is better?
Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 leads the overall LLM Stats Score 29.9 to 19.1, ranking #122 overall.
In the 3 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 wins 3; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.
Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.
Choose Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05
- overall performance matters — it scores 29.9 and ranks #122 on LLM Stats
- your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
- you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 3 of 3 exact shared results
- you want the most recent training data — it shipped Jun 2025
Choose Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1
- you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune
At a glance
The differences that matter most.
Capability indexes
Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks
Individual benchmarks
13 reported for Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 · 6 for Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1
Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 outperforms in 3 benchmarks (AIME 2025, GPQA, LiveCodeBench), while Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 is better at 0 benchmarks.
Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.
Human preference
Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
Only Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 specifies input context (1,048,576 tokens). Only Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 specifies output context (65,535 tokens).
Input capabilities
Documented input modalities across available providers
Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 supports multimodal inputs, whereas Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 does not.
Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.
Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1
License
Usage and distribution terms
Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 is licensed under a proprietary license, while Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 uses Llama 3.1 Community License.
License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.
Proprietary
Closed source
Llama 3.1 Community License
Open weights
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 was released on 2025-06-05, while Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 was released on 2025-04-07.
Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 is 2 months newer than Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1.
Jun 5, 2025
1.3 years ago
1mo newerApr 7, 2025
1.5 years ago
Knowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 has a knowledge cutoff of 2025-01-31, while Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 has a cutoff of 2023-12-01.
Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 has more recent training data (up to 2025-01-31), making it potentially better informed about events through that date compared to Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 (2023-12-01).
Jan 2025
1.1 yr newerDec 2023
Outputs Comparison
Judge for yourself.
Run your own prompts against Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 and Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.
FAQ
Common questions about Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 vs Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1.
Related comparisons
More Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 comparisons
More Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 comparisons
- Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 vs Atria Dawn Preview
- Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 vs Kimi K2.8 Preview
- Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 vs DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
- Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 vs GPT-6 Astra
- Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 vs Ling 3.0 Flash Fin
- Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 vs Gemini 3.8 Flash