Model Comparison

Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 vs MiMo-V2-FlashWhich is better in 2026?

MiMo-V2-Flash shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks. MiMo-V2-Flash is 22.9x cheaper per token.

Verdict: Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 vs MiMo-V2-Flash — which is better?

Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 (by Google) and MiMo-V2-Flash (by Xiaomi) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.

Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 outperforms in 1 benchmarks (GPQA), while MiMo-V2-Flash is better at 3 benchmarks (AIME 2025, Humanity's Last Exam, SWE-Bench Verified). MiMo-V2-Flash shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

On price, MiMo-V2-Flash is roughly 22.9x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 also accepts a larger context window (1,048,576 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Choose Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 if…

  • you process long inputs — it offers a 1,048,576 token context window

Choose MiMo-V2-Flash if…

  • you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 3 of 4 shared benchmarks
  • cost matters — it's about 22.9x cheaper per token
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Dec 2025
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

4 benchmarks

Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 outperforms in 1 benchmarks (GPQA), while MiMo-V2-Flash is better at 3 benchmarks (AIME 2025, Humanity's Last Exam, SWE-Bench Verified).

MiMo-V2-Flash shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

Wed Jul 22 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

MiMo-V2-Flash costs less

For input processing, Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 ($1.25/1M tokens) is 12.5x more expensive than MiMo-V2-Flash ($0.10/1M tokens).

For output processing, Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 ($10.00/1M tokens) is 33.3x more expensive than MiMo-V2-Flash ($0.30/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 is more expensive than MiMo-V2-Flash.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Wed Jul 22 2026 • llm-stats.com
Google
Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05
Input tokens$1.25
Output tokens$10.00
Best providerGoogle
Xiaomi
MiMo-V2-Flash
Input tokens$0.10
Output tokens$0.30
Best providerXiaomi
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 accepts 1,048,576 input tokens compared to MiMo-V2-Flash's 256,000 tokens. Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 can generate longer responses up to 65,535 tokens, while MiMo-V2-Flash is limited to 16,384 tokens.

Google
Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output65,535 tokens
Xiaomi
MiMo-V2-Flash
Input256,000 tokens
Output16,384 tokens
Wed Jul 22 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 supports multimodal inputs, whereas MiMo-V2-Flash does not.

Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05

Text
Images
Audio
Video

MiMo-V2-Flash

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 is licensed under a proprietary license, while MiMo-V2-Flash uses MIT.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05

Proprietary

Closed source

MiMo-V2-Flash

MIT

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 was released on 2025-06-05, while MiMo-V2-Flash was released on 2025-12-16.

MiMo-V2-Flash is 6 months newer than Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05.

Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05

Jun 5, 2025

1.1 years ago

MiMo-V2-Flash

Dec 16, 2025

7 months ago

6mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2025-01-31, while MiMo-V2-Flash's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05's training data extends to 2025-01-31, but cannot make a direct comparison without MiMo-V2-Flash's cutoff date.

Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05

Jan 2025

MiMo-V2-Flash

—

Provider Availability

Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 is available from Google. MiMo-V2-Flash is available from Xiaomi.

Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05

google logo
Google
Input Price:Input: $1.25/1MOutput Price:Output: $10.00/1M

MiMo-V2-Flash

xiaomi logo
Xiaomi
Input Price:Input: $0.10/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.30/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Google
Larger context window (1,048,576 tokens)
Supports multimodal inputs
Higher GPQA score (86.4% vs 83.7%)
Xiaomi
Less expensive input tokens
Less expensive output tokens
Has open weights
Higher AIME 2025 score (94.1% vs 88.0%)
Higher Humanity's Last Exam score (22.1% vs 21.6%)
Higher SWE-Bench Verified score (73.4% vs 67.2%)

Detailed Comparison

Interactive Arena

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 and MiMo-V2-Flash side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05
✓ Preferred
MiMo-V2-Flash
Open in Playground
AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Google
Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05
Xiaomi
MiMo-V2-Flash

FAQ

Common questions about Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 vs MiMo-V2-Flash.

Which is better, Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 or MiMo-V2-Flash?

MiMo-V2-Flash shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks. Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 is made by Google and MiMo-V2-Flash is made by Xiaomi. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 compare to MiMo-V2-Flash in benchmarks?

Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 scores Global-MMLU-Lite: 89.2%, AIME 2025: 88.0%, FACTS Grounding: 87.8%, GPQA: 86.4%, VideoMMMU: 83.6%. MiMo-V2-Flash scores AIME 2025: 94.1%, Arena-Hard v2: 86.2%, MMLU-Pro: 84.9%, HMMT 2025: 84.4%, GPQA: 83.7%.

Is Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 cheaper than MiMo-V2-Flash?

MiMo-V2-Flash is 12.5x cheaper for input tokens. Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 costs $1.25/M input and $10.00/M output via google. MiMo-V2-Flash costs $0.10/M input and $0.30/M output via xiaomi.

What are the context window sizes for Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 and MiMo-V2-Flash?

Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 supports 1.0M tokens and MiMo-V2-Flash supports 256K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 and MiMo-V2-Flash?

Key differences include context window (1.0M vs 256K), input pricing ($1.25 vs $0.10/M), multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Proprietary vs MIT). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 and MiMo-V2-Flash?

Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 is developed by Google and MiMo-V2-Flash is developed by Xiaomi.

Related comparisons