The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 vs Muse Glimmer-30B

Muse Glimmer-30B leads the LLM Stats Score 35.2 to 29.5. Muse Glimmer-30B is 6.5x cheaper per token.

Google · Meta · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Muse Glimmer-30B leads the overall LLM Stats Score 35.2 to 29.5, ranking #106 overall.

In the 3 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Muse Glimmer-30B wins 2; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

On price, Muse Glimmer-30B is roughly 6.5x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 also accepts a larger context window (1,048,576 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05

  • you process long inputs — it offers a 1,048,576 token context window

Choose Muse Glimmer-30B

  • overall performance matters — it scores 35.2 and ranks #106 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 2 of 3 exact shared results
  • cost matters — it's about 6.5x cheaper per token
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Aug 2026
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05
Google
Muse Glimmer-30B
Meta
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
29.5
#149
35.2
#106
Reasoning
27.9
#154
34.7
#104
Coding
16.5
#146
22.5
#99
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
1 of 3
2 of 3
Input price
$1.25 / M
$0.30 / M
Output price
$10.00 / M
$1.20 / M
Context window
1,048,576
131,072

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

3 shared
Index
Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05
Muse Glimmer-30B
Math
21.6#153
28.4#100
Vision
18.6#95
20.4#85
Multimodal
24.6#64
23.5#70
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

13 reported for Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 · 32 for Muse Glimmer-30B

3 shared

Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 outperforms in 1 benchmarks (GPQA), while Muse Glimmer-30B is better at 2 benchmarks (Humanity's Last Exam, SWE-Bench Verified).

Muse Glimmer-30B shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

Thu Oct 22 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Muse Glimmer-30B costs less

For input processing, Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 ($1.25/1M tokens) is 4.2x more expensive than Muse Glimmer-30B ($0.30/1M tokens).

For output processing, Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 ($10.00/1M tokens) is 8.3x more expensive than Muse Glimmer-30B ($1.20/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 is more expensive than Muse Glimmer-30B.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Thu Oct 22 2026 • llm-stats.com
Google
Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05
Input tokens$1.25
Output tokens$10.00
Best providerGoogle
Meta
Muse Glimmer-30B
Input tokens$0.30
Output tokens$1.20
Best providerDeepinfra
Notice missing or incorrect data?

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 accepts 1,048,576 input tokens compared to Muse Glimmer-30B's 131,072 tokens. Muse Glimmer-30B can generate longer responses up to 131,072 tokens, while Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 is limited to 65,535 tokens.

Google
Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output65,535 tokens
Meta
Muse Glimmer-30B
Input131,072 tokens
Output131,072 tokens
Thu Oct 22 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 and Muse Glimmer-30B support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Muse Glimmer-30B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 is licensed under a proprietary license, while Muse Glimmer-30B uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05

Proprietary

Closed source

Muse Glimmer-30B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 was released on 2025-06-05, while Muse Glimmer-30B was released on 2026-08-10.

Muse Glimmer-30B is 14 months newer than Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05.

Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05

Jun 5, 2025

1.4 years ago

Muse Glimmer-30B

Aug 10, 2026

2 months ago

1.2yr newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 has a knowledge cutoff of 2025-01-31, while Muse Glimmer-30B has a cutoff of 2026-01-04.

Muse Glimmer-30B has more recent training data (up to 2026-01-04), making it potentially better informed about events through that date compared to Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 (2025-01-31).

Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05

Jan 2025

Muse Glimmer-30B

Jan 2026

1 yr newer

Provider Availability

Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 is available from Google. Muse Glimmer-30B is available from DeepInfra.

Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05

google logo
Google
Input Price:Input: $1.25/1MOutput Price:Output: $10.00/1M

Muse Glimmer-30B

deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.30/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.20/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 and Muse Glimmer-30B side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05
✓ Preferred
Muse Glimmer-30B
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 vs Muse Glimmer-30B.

Which is better, Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 or Muse Glimmer-30B?

Muse Glimmer-30B leads the LLM Stats Score 35.2 to 29.5. Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 is made by Google and Muse Glimmer-30B is made by Meta. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 compare to Muse Glimmer-30B in benchmarks?

Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 scores Global-MMLU-Lite: 89.2%, AIME 2025: 88.0%, FACTS Grounding: 87.8%, GPQA: 86.4%, VideoMMMU: 83.6%. Muse Glimmer-30B scores AIME 2026: 94.7%, Siren AgentDojo Utility: 94.2%, Tau2 Telecom: 94.1%, PinchBench: 90.5%, Tau2 Retail: 87.1%.

Is Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 cheaper than Muse Glimmer-30B?

Muse Glimmer-30B is 4.2x cheaper for input tokens. Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 costs $1.25/M input and $10.00/M output via google. Muse Glimmer-30B costs $0.30/M input and $1.20/M output via deepinfra.

What are the context window sizes for Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 and Muse Glimmer-30B?

Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 supports 1.0M tokens and Muse Glimmer-30B supports 131K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 and Muse Glimmer-30B?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (29.5 vs 35.2), context window (1.0M vs 131K), input pricing ($1.25 vs $0.30/M), licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 and Muse Glimmer-30B?

Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 is developed by Google and Muse Glimmer-30B is developed by Meta.

Related comparisons