Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 vs Muse Spark 1.3
Muse Spark 1.3 leads the LLM Stats Score 55.3 to 29.9. Muse Spark 1.3 is 27.5x cheaper per token.
Google · Meta · Updated for 2026
Which is better?
Muse Spark 1.3 leads the overall LLM Stats Score 55.3 to 29.9, ranking #5 overall.
In the 1 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Muse Spark 1.3 wins 1; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.
On price, Muse Spark 1.3 is roughly 27.5x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.
Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.
Choose Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05
- you want predictable pricing at $1.25/M input and $10.00/M output
Choose Muse Spark 1.3
- overall performance matters — it scores 55.3 and ranks #5 on LLM Stats
- your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
- you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 1 of 1 exact shared results
- cost matters — it's about 27.5x cheaper per token
- you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026
At a glance
The differences that matter most.
Individual benchmarks
13 reported for Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 · 11 for Muse Spark 1.3
Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Muse Spark 1.3 is better at 1 benchmark (MRCR v2 (8-needle)).
Muse Spark 1.3 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.
Human preference
Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
For input processing, Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 ($1.25/1M tokens) is 12.5x more expensive than Muse Spark 1.3 ($0.10/1M tokens).
For output processing, Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 ($10.00/1M tokens) is 50.0x more expensive than Muse Spark 1.3 ($0.20/1M tokens).
In conclusion, Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 is more expensive than Muse Spark 1.3.*
* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
Both models have the same input context window of 1,048,576 tokens. Muse Spark 1.3 can generate longer responses up to 943,718 tokens, while Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 is limited to 65,535 tokens.
Input capabilities
Documented input modalities across available providers
Both Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 and Muse Spark 1.3 support multimodal inputs.
They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.
Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05
Muse Spark 1.3
License
Usage and distribution terms
Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.
Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.
Proprietary
Closed source
Proprietary
Closed source
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 was released on 2025-06-05, while Muse Spark 1.3 was released on 2026-09-02.
Muse Spark 1.3 is 15 months newer than Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05.
Jun 5, 2025
1.3 years ago
Sep 2, 2026
3 days ago
1.2yr newerKnowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2025-01-31, while Muse Spark 1.3's cutoff date is not specified.
We can confirm Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05's training data extends to 2025-01-31, but cannot make a direct comparison without Muse Spark 1.3's cutoff date.
Jan 2025
—
Provider Availability
Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 is available from Google. Muse Spark 1.3 is available from Meta Model API.
Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05
Muse Spark 1.3
Outputs Comparison
Judge for yourself.
Run your own prompts against Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 and Muse Spark 1.3 side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.
FAQ
Common questions about Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 vs Muse Spark 1.3.