The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Qwen2.5 32B Instruct

Gemini 2.5 Pro leads the LLM Stats Score 27.8 to 7.7.

Google · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Gemini 2.5 Pro leads the overall LLM Stats Score 27.8 to 7.7, ranking #137 overall.

In the 1 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Gemini 2.5 Pro wins 1; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Gemini 2.5 Pro

  • overall performance matters — it scores 27.8 and ranks #137 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 1 of 1 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped May 2025

Choose Qwen2.5 32B Instruct

  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
27.8
#137
7.7
#283
27.3
#137
7.2
#282
12.8
#140
9.4
#171
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
1 of 1
0 of 1
Input price
$1.25 / M
— / M
Output price
$10.00 / M
— / M
Context window
1,000,000

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Qwen2.5 32B Instruct
22.6#135
16.4#206
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

16 reported for Gemini 2.5 Pro · 18 for Qwen2.5 32B Instruct

1 shared

Gemini 2.5 Pro outperforms in 1 benchmarks (GPQA), while Qwen2.5 32B Instruct is better at 0 benchmarks.

Gemini 2.5 Pro significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Sun Sep 13 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Gemini 2.5 Pro specifies input context (1,000,000 tokens). Only Gemini 2.5 Pro specifies output context (1,000,000 tokens).

Google
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Input1,000,000 tokens
Output1,000,000 tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5 32B Instruct
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Sun Sep 13 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Gemini 2.5 Pro supports multimodal inputs, whereas Qwen2.5 32B Instruct does not.

Gemini 2.5 Pro can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Gemini 2.5 Pro

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen2.5 32B Instruct

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemini 2.5 Pro is licensed under a proprietary license, while Qwen2.5 32B Instruct uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemini 2.5 Pro

Proprietary

Closed source

Qwen2.5 32B Instruct

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 2.5 Pro was released on 2025-05-20, while Qwen2.5 32B Instruct was released on 2024-09-19.

Gemini 2.5 Pro is 8 months newer than Qwen2.5 32B Instruct.

Gemini 2.5 Pro

May 20, 2025

1.3 years ago

8mo newer
Qwen2.5 32B Instruct

Sep 19, 2024

2.0 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemini 2.5 Pro has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2025-01-31, while Qwen2.5 32B Instruct's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemini 2.5 Pro's training data extends to 2025-01-31, but cannot make a direct comparison without Qwen2.5 32B Instruct's cutoff date.

Gemini 2.5 Pro

Jan 2025

Qwen2.5 32B Instruct

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemini 2.5 Pro and Qwen2.5 32B Instruct side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemini 2.5 Pro
✓ Preferred
Qwen2.5 32B Instruct
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Qwen2.5 32B Instruct.

Which is better, Gemini 2.5 Pro or Qwen2.5 32B Instruct?

Gemini 2.5 Pro leads the LLM Stats Score 27.8 to 7.7. Gemini 2.5 Pro is made by Google and Qwen2.5 32B Instruct is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Gemini 2.5 Pro compare to Qwen2.5 32B Instruct in benchmarks?

Gemini 2.5 Pro scores MRCR: 93.0%, AIME 2024: 92.0%, Global-MMLU-Lite: 88.6%, Video-MME: 84.8%, AIME 2025: 83.0%. Qwen2.5 32B Instruct scores GSM8k: 95.9%, HumanEval: 88.4%, HellaSwag: 85.2%, BBH: 84.5%, MBPP: 84.0%.

What are the context window sizes for Gemini 2.5 Pro and Qwen2.5 32B Instruct?

Gemini 2.5 Pro supports 1.0M tokens and Qwen2.5 32B Instruct supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Gemini 2.5 Pro and Qwen2.5 32B Instruct?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (27.8 vs 7.7), multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemini 2.5 Pro and Qwen2.5 32B Instruct?

Gemini 2.5 Pro is developed by Google and Qwen2.5 32B Instruct is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.