Model Comparison

Gemini 3 Flash vs DeepSeek-V3.2-SpecialeWhich is better in 2026?

Gemini 3 Flash significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale is 3.6x cheaper per token.

Verdict: Gemini 3 Flash vs DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale — which is better?

Gemini 3 Flash (by Google) and DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale (by DeepSeek) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.

Gemini 3 Flash outperforms in 6 benchmarks (AIME 2025, Humanity's Last Exam, SWE-Bench Verified, t2-bench, Terminal-Bench 2.0, Toolathlon), while DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale is better at 0 benchmarks. Gemini 3 Flash significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

On price, DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale is roughly 3.6x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Gemini 3 Flash also accepts a larger context window (1,000,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Choose Gemini 3 Flash if…

  • you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 6 of 6 shared benchmarks
  • you process long inputs — it offers a 1,000,000 token context window
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Dec 2025

Choose DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale if…

  • cost matters — it's about 3.6x cheaper per token
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune
Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

6 benchmarks

Gemini 3 Flash outperforms in 6 benchmarks (AIME 2025, Humanity's Last Exam, SWE-Bench Verified, t2-bench, Terminal-Bench 2.0, Toolathlon), while DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale is better at 0 benchmarks.

Gemini 3 Flash significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Sat Jun 13 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale costs less

For input processing, Gemini 3 Flash ($0.50/1M tokens) is 1.8x more expensive than DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale ($0.28/1M tokens).

For output processing, Gemini 3 Flash ($3.00/1M tokens) is 7.1x more expensive than DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale ($0.42/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Gemini 3 Flash is more expensive than DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Sat Jun 13 2026 • llm-stats.com
Google
Gemini 3 Flash
Input tokens$0.50
Output tokens$3.00
Best providerGoogle
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale
Input tokens$0.28
Output tokens$0.42
Best providerDeepSeek
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Gemini 3 Flash accepts 1,000,000 input tokens compared to DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale's 131,072 tokens. DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale can generate longer responses up to 131,072 tokens, while Gemini 3 Flash is limited to 65,536 tokens.

Google
Gemini 3 Flash
Input1,000,000 tokens
Output65,536 tokens
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale
Input131,072 tokens
Output131,072 tokens
Sat Jun 13 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Gemini 3 Flash supports multimodal inputs, whereas DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale does not.

Gemini 3 Flash can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Gemini 3 Flash

Text
Images
Audio
Video

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemini 3 Flash is licensed under a proprietary license, while DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale uses MIT.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemini 3 Flash

Proprietary

Closed source

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale

MIT

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 3 Flash was released on 2025-12-17, while DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale was released on 2025-12-01.

Gemini 3 Flash is 1 month newer than DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale.

Gemini 3 Flash

Dec 17, 2025

5 months ago

2w newer
DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale

Dec 1, 2025

6 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemini 3 Flash has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2025-01-31, while DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemini 3 Flash's training data extends to 2025-01-31, but cannot make a direct comparison without DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale's cutoff date.

Gemini 3 Flash

Jan 2025

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale

—

Provider Availability

Gemini 3 Flash is available from Google. DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale is available from DeepSeek.

Gemini 3 Flash

google logo
Google
Input Price:Input: $0.50/1MOutput Price:Output: $3.00/1M

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale

deepseek logo
DeepSeek
Input Price:Input: $0.28/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.42/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Google
Larger context window (1,000,000 tokens)
Supports multimodal inputs
Higher AIME 2025 score (99.7% vs 96.0%)
Higher Humanity's Last Exam score (43.5% vs 30.6%)
Higher SWE-Bench Verified score (78.0% vs 73.1%)
Higher t2-bench score (90.2% vs 80.3%)
Higher Terminal-Bench 2.0 score (47.6% vs 46.4%)
Higher Toolathlon score (49.4% vs 35.2%)
DeepSeek
Less expensive input tokens
Less expensive output tokens
Has open weights

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Google
Gemini 3 Flash
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale

FAQ

Common questions about Gemini 3 Flash vs DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale.

Which is better, Gemini 3 Flash or DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale?

Gemini 3 Flash significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Gemini 3 Flash is made by Google and DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale is made by DeepSeek. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Gemini 3 Flash compare to DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale in benchmarks?

Gemini 3 Flash scores Vending-Bench 2: 100.0%, AIME 2025: 99.7%, Global PIQA: 92.8%, MMMLU: 91.8%, GPQA: 90.4%. DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale scores HMMT 2025: 99.2%, AIME 2025: 96.0%, CodeForces: 90.0%, t2-bench: 80.3%, SWE-Bench Verified: 73.1%.

Is Gemini 3 Flash cheaper than DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale?

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale is 1.8x cheaper for input tokens. Gemini 3 Flash costs $0.50/M input and $3.00/M output via google. DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale costs $0.28/M input and $0.42/M output via deepseek.

What are the context window sizes for Gemini 3 Flash and DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale?

Gemini 3 Flash supports 1.0M tokens and DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale supports 131K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Gemini 3 Flash and DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale?

Key differences include context window (1.0M vs 131K), input pricing ($0.50 vs $0.28/M), multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Proprietary vs MIT). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemini 3 Flash and DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale?

Gemini 3 Flash is developed by Google and DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale is developed by DeepSeek.

Related comparisons