Model Comparison

GLM-5 vs Gemini 3 Flash

Both models are evenly matched across the benchmarks. Gemini 3 Flash is 1.4x cheaper per token.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

4 benchmarks

GLM-5 outperforms in 2 benchmarks (MCP Atlas, Terminal-Bench 2.0), while Gemini 3 Flash is better at 2 benchmarks (SWE-Bench Verified, t2-bench).

Both models are evenly matched across the benchmarks.

Sat May 02 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Gemini 3 Flash costs less

For input processing, GLM-5 ($1.00/1M tokens) is 2.0x more expensive than Gemini 3 Flash ($0.50/1M tokens).

For output processing, GLM-5 ($3.20/1M tokens) is 1.1x more expensive than Gemini 3 Flash ($3.00/1M tokens).

In conclusion, GLM-5 is more expensive than Gemini 3 Flash.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Sat May 02 2026 • llm-stats.com
Zhipu AI
GLM-5
Input tokens$1.00
Output tokens$3.20
Best providerUnknown Organization
Google
Gemini 3 Flash
Input tokens$0.50
Output tokens$3.00
Best providerGoogle
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Gemini 3 Flash accepts 1,000,000 input tokens compared to GLM-5's 200,000 tokens. GLM-5 can generate longer responses up to 128,000 tokens, while Gemini 3 Flash is limited to 65,536 tokens.

Zhipu AI
GLM-5
Input200,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Google
Gemini 3 Flash
Input1,000,000 tokens
Output65,536 tokens
Sat May 02 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Gemini 3 Flash supports multimodal inputs, whereas GLM-5 does not.

Gemini 3 Flash can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

GLM-5

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Gemini 3 Flash

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

GLM-5 is licensed under MIT, while Gemini 3 Flash uses a proprietary license.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

GLM-5

MIT

Open weights

Gemini 3 Flash

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

GLM-5 was released on 2026-02-11, while Gemini 3 Flash was released on 2025-12-17.

GLM-5 is 2 months newer than Gemini 3 Flash.

GLM-5

Feb 11, 2026

2 months ago

1mo newer
Gemini 3 Flash

Dec 17, 2025

4 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemini 3 Flash has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2025-01-31, while GLM-5's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemini 3 Flash's training data extends to 2025-01-31, but cannot make a direct comparison without GLM-5's cutoff date.

GLM-5

—

Gemini 3 Flash

Jan 2025

Provider Availability

GLM-5 is available from ZAI. Gemini 3 Flash is available from Google.

GLM-5

z logo
Unknown Organization
Input Price:Input: $1.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $3.20/1M

Gemini 3 Flash

google logo
Google
Input Price:Input: $0.50/1MOutput Price:Output: $3.00/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Zhipu AI
Has open weights
Higher MCP Atlas score (67.8% vs 57.4%)
Higher Terminal-Bench 2.0 score (56.2% vs 47.6%)
Google
Larger context window (1,000,000 tokens)
Supports multimodal inputs
Less expensive input tokens
Less expensive output tokens
Higher SWE-Bench Verified score (78.0% vs 77.8%)
Higher t2-bench score (90.2% vs 89.7%)

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Zhipu AI
GLM-5
Google
Gemini 3 Flash

FAQ

Common questions about GLM-5 vs Gemini 3 Flash

Both models are evenly matched across the benchmarks. GLM-5 is made by Zhipu AI and Gemini 3 Flash is made by Google. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.
GLM-5 scores t2-bench: 89.7%, SWE-Bench Verified: 77.8%, BrowseComp: 75.9%, MCP Atlas: 67.8%, Terminal-Bench 2.0: 56.2%. Gemini 3 Flash scores Vending-Bench 2: 100.0%, AIME 2025: 99.7%, Global PIQA: 92.8%, MMMLU: 91.8%, GPQA: 90.4%.
Gemini 3 Flash is 2.0x cheaper for input tokens. GLM-5 costs $1.00/M input and $3.20/M output via z. Gemini 3 Flash costs $0.50/M input and $3.00/M output via google.
GLM-5 supports 200K tokens and Gemini 3 Flash supports 1.0M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.
Key differences include context window (200K vs 1.0M), input pricing ($1.00 vs $0.50/M), multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (MIT vs Proprietary). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.
GLM-5 is developed by Zhipu AI and Gemini 3 Flash is developed by Google.