Gemini 2.5 Flash vs Gemini 3 Flash
Gemini 3 Flash leads the LLM Stats Score 36.7 to 21.7. Gemini 2.5 Flash is 1.3x cheaper per token.
Google · Google · Updated for 2026
Which is better?
Gemini 3 Flash leads the overall LLM Stats Score 36.7 to 21.7, ranking #89 overall.
In the 6 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Gemini 3 Flash wins 5; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.
On price, Gemini 2.5 Flash is roughly 1.3x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.
Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.
Choose Gemini 2.5 Flash
- cost matters — it's about 1.3x cheaper per token
Choose Gemini 3 Flash
- overall performance matters — it scores 36.7 and ranks #89 on LLM Stats
- your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
- you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 5 of 6 exact shared results
- you want the most recent training data — it shipped Dec 2025
At a glance
The differences that matter most.
Capability indexes
Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks
Individual benchmarks
14 reported for Gemini 2.5 Flash · 24 for Gemini 3 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash outperforms in 1 benchmarks (FACTS Grounding), while Gemini 3 Flash is better at 5 benchmarks (AIME 2025, GPQA, Humanity's Last Exam, SimpleQA, SWE-Bench Verified).
Gemini 3 Flash significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.
Human preference
Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
For input processing, Gemini 2.5 Flash ($0.30/1M tokens) is 1.7x cheaper than Gemini 3 Flash ($0.50/1M tokens).
For output processing, Gemini 2.5 Flash ($2.50/1M tokens) is 1.2x cheaper than Gemini 3 Flash ($3.00/1M tokens).
In conclusion, Gemini 3 Flash is more expensive than Gemini 2.5 Flash.*
* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
Both models have the same input context window of 1,000,000 tokens. Gemini 2.5 Flash can generate longer responses up to 1,000,000 tokens, while Gemini 3 Flash is limited to 65,536 tokens.
Input capabilities
Documented input modalities across available providers
Both Gemini 2.5 Flash and Gemini 3 Flash support multimodal inputs.
They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 3 Flash
License
Usage and distribution terms
Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.
Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.
Proprietary
Closed source
Proprietary
Closed source
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
Gemini 2.5 Flash was released on 2025-05-20, while Gemini 3 Flash was released on 2025-12-17.
Gemini 3 Flash is 7 months newer than Gemini 2.5 Flash.
May 20, 2025
1.4 years ago
Dec 17, 2025
10 months ago
7mo newerKnowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Both models have the same knowledge cutoff date of 2025-01-31.
They should have similar awareness of historical events and information up to this date.
Jan 2025
Jan 2025
Provider Availability
Gemini 2.5 Flash is available from DeepInfra, Google. Gemini 3 Flash is available from Google.
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 3 Flash
Outputs Comparison
Judge for yourself.
Run your own prompts against Gemini 2.5 Flash and Gemini 3 Flash side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.
FAQ
Common questions about Gemini 2.5 Flash vs Gemini 3 Flash.