Model Comparison
Gemini 3 Flash vs GLM-5V-TurboWhich is better in 2026?
Gemini 3 Flash significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Gemini 3 Flash is 1.7x cheaper per token.
Verdict: Gemini 3 Flash vs GLM-5V-Turbo — which is better?
Gemini 3 Flash (by Google) and GLM-5V-Turbo (by Zhipu AI) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.
Gemini 3 Flash outperforms in 1 benchmarks (FACTS Grounding), while GLM-5V-Turbo is better at 0 benchmarks. Gemini 3 Flash significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.
On price, Gemini 3 Flash is roughly 1.7x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.
Gemini 3 Flash also accepts a larger context window (1,000,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.
Choose Gemini 3 Flash if…
- you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 1 of 1 shared benchmarks
- cost matters — it's about 1.7x cheaper per token
- you process long inputs — it offers a 1,000,000 token context window
Choose GLM-5V-Turbo if…
- you want the most recent training data — it shipped Apr 2026
Performance Benchmarks
Comparative analysis across standard metrics
Gemini 3 Flash outperforms in 1 benchmarks (FACTS Grounding), while GLM-5V-Turbo is better at 0 benchmarks.
Gemini 3 Flash significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.
Arena Performance
Human preference votes
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
For input processing, Gemini 3 Flash ($0.50/1M tokens) is 2.4x cheaper than GLM-5V-Turbo ($1.20/1M tokens).
For output processing, Gemini 3 Flash ($3.00/1M tokens) is 1.3x cheaper than GLM-5V-Turbo ($4.00/1M tokens).
In conclusion, GLM-5V-Turbo is more expensive than Gemini 3 Flash.*
* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
Gemini 3 Flash accepts 1,000,000 input tokens compared to GLM-5V-Turbo's 200,000 tokens. GLM-5V-Turbo can generate longer responses up to 128,000 tokens, while Gemini 3 Flash is limited to 65,536 tokens.
Input Capabilities
Supported data types and modalities
Both Gemini 3 Flash and GLM-5V-Turbo support multimodal inputs.
They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.
Gemini 3 Flash
GLM-5V-Turbo
License
Usage and distribution terms
Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.
Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.
Proprietary
Closed source
Proprietary
Closed source
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
Gemini 3 Flash was released on 2025-12-17, while GLM-5V-Turbo was released on 2026-04-02.
GLM-5V-Turbo is 4 months newer than Gemini 3 Flash.
Dec 17, 2025
6 months ago
Apr 2, 2026
3 months ago
3mo newerKnowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Gemini 3 Flash has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2025-01-31, while GLM-5V-Turbo's cutoff date is not specified.
We can confirm Gemini 3 Flash's training data extends to 2025-01-31, but cannot make a direct comparison without GLM-5V-Turbo's cutoff date.
Jan 2025
—
Provider Availability
Gemini 3 Flash is available from Google. GLM-5V-Turbo is available from ZAI.
Gemini 3 Flash
GLM-5V-Turbo
Outputs Comparison
Key Takeaways
GLM-5V-Turbo
View detailsZhipu AI
No standout differentiators in the data we have for this pair.
Detailed Comparison
Interactive Arena
Judge for yourself.
Run your own prompts against Gemini 3 Flash and GLM-5V-Turbo side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.
| Feature |
|---|
FAQ
Common questions about Gemini 3 Flash vs GLM-5V-Turbo.