Model Comparison

Gemini 3 Flash vs GPT-4.1 nano

Gemini 3 Flash significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. GPT-4.1 nano is 6.4x cheaper per token.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

3 benchmarks

Gemini 3 Flash outperforms in 3 benchmarks (CharXiv-R, GPQA, MMMLU), while GPT-4.1 nano is better at 0 benchmarks.

Gemini 3 Flash significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Wed Apr 15 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

GPT-4.1 nano costs less

For input processing, Gemini 3 Flash ($0.50/1M tokens) is 5.0x more expensive than GPT-4.1 nano ($0.10/1M tokens).

For output processing, Gemini 3 Flash ($3.00/1M tokens) is 7.5x more expensive than GPT-4.1 nano ($0.40/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Gemini 3 Flash is more expensive than GPT-4.1 nano.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Wed Apr 15 2026 • llm-stats.com
Google
Gemini 3 Flash
Input tokens$0.50
Output tokens$3.00
Best providerGoogle
OpenAI
GPT-4.1 nano
Input tokens$0.10
Output tokens$0.40
Best providerOpenAI
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

GPT-4.1 nano accepts 1,047,576 input tokens compared to Gemini 3 Flash's 1,000,000 tokens. Gemini 3 Flash can generate longer responses up to 65,536 tokens, while GPT-4.1 nano is limited to 32,768 tokens.

Google
Gemini 3 Flash
Input1,000,000 tokens
Output65,536 tokens
OpenAI
GPT-4.1 nano
Input1,047,576 tokens
Output32,768 tokens
Wed Apr 15 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Both Gemini 3 Flash and GPT-4.1 nano support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Gemini 3 Flash

Text
Images
Audio
Video

GPT-4.1 nano

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Gemini 3 Flash

Proprietary

Closed source

GPT-4.1 nano

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 3 Flash was released on 2025-12-17, while GPT-4.1 nano was released on 2025-04-14.

Gemini 3 Flash is 8 months newer than GPT-4.1 nano.

Gemini 3 Flash

Dec 17, 2025

3 months ago

8mo newer
GPT-4.1 nano

Apr 14, 2025

1.0 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemini 3 Flash has a knowledge cutoff of 2025-01-31, while GPT-4.1 nano has a cutoff of 2024-05-31.

Gemini 3 Flash has more recent training data (up to 2025-01-31), making it potentially better informed about events through that date compared to GPT-4.1 nano (2024-05-31).

Gemini 3 Flash

Jan 2025

8 mo newer
GPT-4.1 nano

May 2024

Provider Availability

Gemini 3 Flash is available from Google. GPT-4.1 nano is available from OpenAI.

Gemini 3 Flash

google logo
Google
Input Price:Input: $0.50/1MOutput Price:Output: $3.00/1M

GPT-4.1 nano

openai logo
OpenAI
Input Price:Input: $0.10/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.40/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Google
Higher CharXiv-R score (80.3% vs 40.5%)
Higher GPQA score (90.4% vs 50.3%)
Higher MMMLU score (91.8% vs 66.9%)
OpenAI
Larger context window (1,047,576 tokens)
Less expensive input tokens
Less expensive output tokens

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Google
Gemini 3 Flash
OpenAI
GPT-4.1 nano

FAQ

Common questions about Gemini 3 Flash vs GPT-4.1 nano

Gemini 3 Flash significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Gemini 3 Flash is made by Google and GPT-4.1 nano is made by OpenAI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.
Gemini 3 Flash scores Vending-Bench 2: 100.0%, AIME 2025: 99.7%, Global PIQA: 92.8%, MMMLU: 91.8%, GPQA: 90.4%. GPT-4.1 nano scores MMLU: 80.1%, IFEval: 74.5%, CharXiv-D: 73.9%, MMMLU: 66.9%, Multi-IF: 57.2%.
GPT-4.1 nano is 5.0x cheaper for input tokens. Gemini 3 Flash costs $0.50/M input and $3.00/M output via google. GPT-4.1 nano costs $0.10/M input and $0.40/M output via openai.
Gemini 3 Flash supports 1.0M tokens and GPT-4.1 nano supports 1.0M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.
Key differences include context window (1.0M vs 1.0M), input pricing ($0.50 vs $0.10/M). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.
Gemini 3 Flash is developed by Google and GPT-4.1 nano is developed by OpenAI.