Model Comparison

Gemini 3 Flash vs GPT OSS 120BWhich is better in 2026?

Gemini 3 Flash significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. GPT OSS 120B is 6.3x cheaper per token.

Verdict: Gemini 3 Flash vs GPT OSS 120B — which is better?

Gemini 3 Flash (by Google) and GPT OSS 120B (by OpenAI) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.

Gemini 3 Flash outperforms in 2 benchmarks (GPQA, Humanity's Last Exam), while GPT OSS 120B is better at 0 benchmarks. Gemini 3 Flash significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

On price, GPT OSS 120B is roughly 6.3x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Gemini 3 Flash also accepts a larger context window (1,000,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Choose Gemini 3 Flash if…

  • you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 2 of 2 shared benchmarks
  • you process long inputs — it offers a 1,000,000 token context window
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Dec 2025

Choose GPT OSS 120B if…

  • cost matters — it's about 6.3x cheaper per token
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune
Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

2 benchmarks

Gemini 3 Flash outperforms in 2 benchmarks (GPQA, Humanity's Last Exam), while GPT OSS 120B is better at 0 benchmarks.

Gemini 3 Flash significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Mon Jun 08 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

GPT OSS 120B costs less

For input processing, Gemini 3 Flash ($0.50/1M tokens) is 5.6x more expensive than GPT OSS 120B ($0.09/1M tokens).

For output processing, Gemini 3 Flash ($3.00/1M tokens) is 6.7x more expensive than GPT OSS 120B ($0.45/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Gemini 3 Flash is more expensive than GPT OSS 120B.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Mon Jun 08 2026 • llm-stats.com
Google
Gemini 3 Flash
Input tokens$0.50
Output tokens$3.00
Best providerGoogle
OpenAI
GPT OSS 120B
Input tokens$0.09
Output tokens$0.45
Best providerDeepinfra
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Gemini 3 Flash accepts 1,000,000 input tokens compared to GPT OSS 120B's 131,072 tokens. GPT OSS 120B can generate longer responses up to 131,072 tokens, while Gemini 3 Flash is limited to 65,536 tokens.

Google
Gemini 3 Flash
Input1,000,000 tokens
Output65,536 tokens
OpenAI
GPT OSS 120B
Input131,072 tokens
Output131,072 tokens
Mon Jun 08 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Gemini 3 Flash supports multimodal inputs, whereas GPT OSS 120B does not.

Gemini 3 Flash can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Gemini 3 Flash

Text
Images
Audio
Video

GPT OSS 120B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemini 3 Flash is licensed under a proprietary license, while GPT OSS 120B uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemini 3 Flash

Proprietary

Closed source

GPT OSS 120B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 3 Flash was released on 2025-12-17, while GPT OSS 120B was released on 2025-08-05.

Gemini 3 Flash is 4 months newer than GPT OSS 120B.

Gemini 3 Flash

Dec 17, 2025

5 months ago

4mo newer
GPT OSS 120B

Aug 5, 2025

10 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemini 3 Flash has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2025-01-31, while GPT OSS 120B's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemini 3 Flash's training data extends to 2025-01-31, but cannot make a direct comparison without GPT OSS 120B's cutoff date.

Gemini 3 Flash

Jan 2025

GPT OSS 120B

—

Provider Availability

Gemini 3 Flash is available from Google. GPT OSS 120B is available from DeepInfra, Novita, OpenAI, Fireworks, Groq.

Gemini 3 Flash

google logo
Google
Input Price:Input: $0.50/1MOutput Price:Output: $3.00/1M

GPT OSS 120B

deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.09/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.45/1M
novita logo
Novita
Input Price:Input: $0.10/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.50/1M
openai logo
OpenAI
Input Price:Input: $0.10/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.50/1M
fireworks logo
Fireworks
Input Price:Input: $0.15/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.60/1M
groq logo
Groq
Input Price:Input: $0.15/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.60/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Google
Larger context window (1,000,000 tokens)
Supports multimodal inputs
Higher GPQA score (90.4% vs 80.1%)
Higher Humanity's Last Exam score (43.5% vs 14.9%)
OpenAI
Less expensive input tokens
Less expensive output tokens
Has open weights

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Google
Gemini 3 Flash
OpenAI
GPT OSS 120B

FAQ

Common questions about Gemini 3 Flash vs GPT OSS 120B.

Which is better, Gemini 3 Flash or GPT OSS 120B?

Gemini 3 Flash significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Gemini 3 Flash is made by Google and GPT OSS 120B is made by OpenAI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Gemini 3 Flash compare to GPT OSS 120B in benchmarks?

Gemini 3 Flash scores Vending-Bench 2: 100.0%, AIME 2025: 99.7%, Global PIQA: 92.8%, MMMLU: 91.8%, GPQA: 90.4%. GPT OSS 120B scores MMLU: 90.0%, CodeForces: 82.1%, GPQA: 80.1%, TAU-bench Retail: 67.8%, HealthBench: 57.6%.

Is Gemini 3 Flash cheaper than GPT OSS 120B?

GPT OSS 120B is 5.6x cheaper for input tokens. Gemini 3 Flash costs $0.50/M input and $3.00/M output via google. GPT OSS 120B costs $0.09/M input and $0.45/M output via deepinfra.

What are the context window sizes for Gemini 3 Flash and GPT OSS 120B?

Gemini 3 Flash supports 1.0M tokens and GPT OSS 120B supports 131K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Gemini 3 Flash and GPT OSS 120B?

Key differences include context window (1.0M vs 131K), input pricing ($0.50 vs $0.09/M), multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemini 3 Flash and GPT OSS 120B?

Gemini 3 Flash is developed by Google and GPT OSS 120B is developed by OpenAI.

Related comparisons