Model Comparison

Gemini 3 Flash vs K-EXAONE-236B-A23BWhich is better in 2026?

Gemini 3 Flash significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. K-EXAONE-236B-A23B is 1.6x cheaper per token.

Verdict: Gemini 3 Flash vs K-EXAONE-236B-A23B — which is better?

Gemini 3 Flash (by Google) and K-EXAONE-236B-A23B (by LG AI Research) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.

Gemini 3 Flash outperforms in 3 benchmarks (AIME 2025, MMMLU, t2-bench), while K-EXAONE-236B-A23B is better at 0 benchmarks. Gemini 3 Flash significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

On price, K-EXAONE-236B-A23B is roughly 1.6x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Gemini 3 Flash also accepts a larger context window (1,000,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Choose Gemini 3 Flash if…

  • you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 3 of 3 shared benchmarks
  • you process long inputs — it offers a 1,000,000 token context window

Choose K-EXAONE-236B-A23B if…

  • cost matters — it's about 1.6x cheaper per token
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Dec 2025
Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

3 benchmarks

Gemini 3 Flash outperforms in 3 benchmarks (AIME 2025, MMMLU, t2-bench), while K-EXAONE-236B-A23B is better at 0 benchmarks.

Gemini 3 Flash significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Sun Jun 07 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

K-EXAONE-236B-A23B costs less

For input processing, Gemini 3 Flash ($0.50/1M tokens) is 1.2x cheaper than K-EXAONE-236B-A23B ($0.60/1M tokens).

For output processing, Gemini 3 Flash ($3.00/1M tokens) is 3.0x more expensive than K-EXAONE-236B-A23B ($1.00/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Gemini 3 Flash is more expensive than K-EXAONE-236B-A23B.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Sun Jun 07 2026 • llm-stats.com
Google
Gemini 3 Flash
Input tokens$0.50
Output tokens$3.00
Best providerGoogle
LG AI Research
K-EXAONE-236B-A23B
Input tokens$0.60
Output tokens$1.00
Best providerFriendliAI
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Gemini 3 Flash accepts 1,000,000 input tokens compared to K-EXAONE-236B-A23B's 32,768 tokens. Gemini 3 Flash can generate longer responses up to 65,536 tokens, while K-EXAONE-236B-A23B is limited to 32,768 tokens.

Google
Gemini 3 Flash
Input1,000,000 tokens
Output65,536 tokens
LG AI Research
K-EXAONE-236B-A23B
Input32,768 tokens
Output32,768 tokens
Sun Jun 07 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Gemini 3 Flash supports multimodal inputs, whereas K-EXAONE-236B-A23B does not.

Gemini 3 Flash can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Gemini 3 Flash

Text
Images
Audio
Video

K-EXAONE-236B-A23B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Gemini 3 Flash

Proprietary

Closed source

K-EXAONE-236B-A23B

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 3 Flash was released on 2025-12-17, while K-EXAONE-236B-A23B was released on 2025-12-31.

K-EXAONE-236B-A23B is 0 month newer than Gemini 3 Flash.

Gemini 3 Flash

Dec 17, 2025

5 months ago

K-EXAONE-236B-A23B

Dec 31, 2025

5 months ago

2w newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemini 3 Flash has a knowledge cutoff of 2025-01-31, while K-EXAONE-236B-A23B has a cutoff of 2025-10-01.

K-EXAONE-236B-A23B has more recent training data (up to 2025-10-01), making it potentially better informed about events through that date compared to Gemini 3 Flash (2025-01-31).

Gemini 3 Flash

Jan 2025

K-EXAONE-236B-A23B

Oct 2025

9 mo newer

Provider Availability

Gemini 3 Flash is available from Google. K-EXAONE-236B-A23B is available from FriendliAI.

Gemini 3 Flash

google logo
Google
Input Price:Input: $0.50/1MOutput Price:Output: $3.00/1M

K-EXAONE-236B-A23B

friendli logo
FriendliAI
Input Price:Input: $0.60/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.00/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Google
Larger context window (1,000,000 tokens)
Supports multimodal inputs
Less expensive input tokens
Higher AIME 2025 score (99.7% vs 92.8%)
Higher MMMLU score (91.8% vs 85.7%)
Higher t2-bench score (90.2% vs 73.2%)
LG AI Research
Less expensive output tokens

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Google
Gemini 3 Flash
LG AI Research
K-EXAONE-236B-A23B

FAQ

Common questions about Gemini 3 Flash vs K-EXAONE-236B-A23B.

Which is better, Gemini 3 Flash or K-EXAONE-236B-A23B?

Gemini 3 Flash significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Gemini 3 Flash is made by Google and K-EXAONE-236B-A23B is made by LG AI Research. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Gemini 3 Flash compare to K-EXAONE-236B-A23B in benchmarks?

Gemini 3 Flash scores Vending-Bench 2: 100.0%, AIME 2025: 99.7%, Global PIQA: 92.8%, MMMLU: 91.8%, GPQA: 90.4%. K-EXAONE-236B-A23B scores AIME 2025: 92.8%, MMMLU: 85.7%, MMLU-Pro: 83.8%, LiveCodeBench v6: 80.7%, t2-bench: 73.2%.

Is Gemini 3 Flash cheaper than K-EXAONE-236B-A23B?

Gemini 3 Flash is 1.2x cheaper for input tokens. Gemini 3 Flash costs $0.50/M input and $3.00/M output via google. K-EXAONE-236B-A23B costs $0.60/M input and $1.00/M output via friendli.

What are the context window sizes for Gemini 3 Flash and K-EXAONE-236B-A23B?

Gemini 3 Flash supports 1.0M tokens and K-EXAONE-236B-A23B supports 33K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Gemini 3 Flash and K-EXAONE-236B-A23B?

Key differences include context window (1.0M vs 33K), input pricing ($0.50 vs $0.60/M), multimodal support (yes vs no). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemini 3 Flash and K-EXAONE-236B-A23B?

Gemini 3 Flash is developed by Google and K-EXAONE-236B-A23B is developed by LG AI Research.

Related comparisons