Model Comparison

Gemini 3 Flash vs K-EXAONE-236B-A23B

Gemini 3 Flash significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. K-EXAONE-236B-A23B is 1.6x cheaper per token.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

3 benchmarks

Gemini 3 Flash outperforms in 3 benchmarks (AIME 2025, MMMLU, t2-bench), while K-EXAONE-236B-A23B is better at 0 benchmarks.

Gemini 3 Flash significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Thu Apr 09 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

K-EXAONE-236B-A23B costs less

For input processing, Gemini 3 Flash ($0.50/1M tokens) is 1.2x cheaper than K-EXAONE-236B-A23B ($0.60/1M tokens).

For output processing, Gemini 3 Flash ($3.00/1M tokens) is 3.0x more expensive than K-EXAONE-236B-A23B ($1.00/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Gemini 3 Flash is more expensive than K-EXAONE-236B-A23B.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Thu Apr 09 2026 • llm-stats.com
Google
Gemini 3 Flash
Input tokens$0.50
Output tokens$3.00
Best providerGoogle
LG AI Research
K-EXAONE-236B-A23B
Input tokens$0.60
Output tokens$1.00
Best providerUnknown Organization
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Gemini 3 Flash accepts 1,000,000 input tokens compared to K-EXAONE-236B-A23B's 32,768 tokens. Gemini 3 Flash can generate longer responses up to 65,536 tokens, while K-EXAONE-236B-A23B is limited to 32,768 tokens.

Google
Gemini 3 Flash
Input1,000,000 tokens
Output65,536 tokens
LG AI Research
K-EXAONE-236B-A23B
Input32,768 tokens
Output32,768 tokens
Thu Apr 09 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Gemini 3 Flash supports multimodal inputs, whereas K-EXAONE-236B-A23B does not.

Gemini 3 Flash can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Gemini 3 Flash

Text
Images
Audio
Video

K-EXAONE-236B-A23B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Gemini 3 Flash

Proprietary

Closed source

K-EXAONE-236B-A23B

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 3 Flash was released on 2025-12-17, while K-EXAONE-236B-A23B was released on 2025-12-31.

K-EXAONE-236B-A23B is 0 month newer than Gemini 3 Flash.

Gemini 3 Flash

Dec 17, 2025

3 months ago

K-EXAONE-236B-A23B

Dec 31, 2025

3 months ago

2w newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemini 3 Flash has a knowledge cutoff of 2025-01-31, while K-EXAONE-236B-A23B has a cutoff of 2025-10-01.

K-EXAONE-236B-A23B has more recent training data (up to 2025-10-01), making it potentially better informed about events through that date compared to Gemini 3 Flash (2025-01-31).

Gemini 3 Flash

Jan 2025

K-EXAONE-236B-A23B

Oct 2025

9 mo newer

Provider Availability

Gemini 3 Flash is available from Google. K-EXAONE-236B-A23B is available from FriendliAI.

Gemini 3 Flash

google logo
Google
Input Price:Input: $0.50/1MOutput Price:Output: $3.00/1M

K-EXAONE-236B-A23B

friendli logo
Unknown Organization
Input Price:Input: $0.60/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.00/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Google
Larger context window (1,000,000 tokens)
Supports multimodal inputs
Less expensive input tokens
Higher AIME 2025 score (99.7% vs 92.8%)
Higher MMMLU score (91.8% vs 85.7%)
Higher t2-bench score (90.2% vs 73.2%)
LG AI Research
Less expensive output tokens

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Google
Gemini 3 Flash
LG AI Research
K-EXAONE-236B-A23B

FAQ

Common questions about Gemini 3 Flash vs K-EXAONE-236B-A23B

Gemini 3 Flash significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Gemini 3 Flash is made by Google and K-EXAONE-236B-A23B is made by LG AI Research. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.
Gemini 3 Flash scores Vending-Bench 2: 100.0%, AIME 2025: 99.7%, Global PIQA: 92.8%, MMMLU: 91.8%, GPQA: 90.4%. K-EXAONE-236B-A23B scores AIME 2025: 92.8%, MMMLU: 85.7%, MMLU-Pro: 83.8%, LiveCodeBench v6: 80.7%, t2-bench: 73.2%.
Gemini 3 Flash is 1.2x cheaper for input tokens. Gemini 3 Flash costs $0.50/M input and $3.00/M output via google. K-EXAONE-236B-A23B costs $0.60/M input and $1.00/M output via friendli.
Gemini 3 Flash supports 1.0M tokens and K-EXAONE-236B-A23B supports 33K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.
Key differences include context window (1.0M vs 33K), input pricing ($0.50 vs $0.60/M), multimodal support (yes vs no). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.
Gemini 3 Flash is developed by Google and K-EXAONE-236B-A23B is developed by LG AI Research.