Gemini 3 Flash vs Llama 4 Maverick
Gemini 3 Flash leads the LLM Stats Score 36.9 to 14.7. Llama 4 Maverick is 4.1x cheaper per token.
Google · Meta · Updated for 2026
Which is better?
Gemini 3 Flash leads the overall LLM Stats Score 36.9 to 14.7, ranking #72 overall.
In the 2 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Gemini 3 Flash wins 2; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.
On price, Llama 4 Maverick is roughly 4.1x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.
Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.
Choose Gemini 3 Flash
- overall performance matters — it scores 36.9 and ranks #72 on LLM Stats
- your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
- you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 2 of 2 exact shared results
- you want the most recent training data — it shipped Dec 2025
Choose Llama 4 Maverick
- cost matters — it's about 4.1x cheaper per token
- you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune
At a glance
The differences that matter most.
Capability indexes
Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks
Individual benchmarks
24 reported for Gemini 3 Flash · 13 for Llama 4 Maverick
Gemini 3 Flash outperforms in 2 benchmarks (GPQA, MMMU-Pro), while Llama 4 Maverick is better at 0 benchmarks.
Gemini 3 Flash significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.
Human preference
Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
For input processing, Gemini 3 Flash ($0.50/1M tokens) is 2.9x more expensive than Llama 4 Maverick ($0.17/1M tokens).
For output processing, Gemini 3 Flash ($3.00/1M tokens) is 5.0x more expensive than Llama 4 Maverick ($0.60/1M tokens).
In conclusion, Gemini 3 Flash is more expensive than Llama 4 Maverick.*
* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
Both models have the same input context window of 1,000,000 tokens. Llama 4 Maverick can generate longer responses up to 1,000,000 tokens, while Gemini 3 Flash is limited to 65,536 tokens.
Input capabilities
Documented input modalities across available providers
Both Gemini 3 Flash and Llama 4 Maverick support multimodal inputs.
They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.
Gemini 3 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
License
Usage and distribution terms
Gemini 3 Flash is licensed under a proprietary license, while Llama 4 Maverick uses Llama 4 Community License Agreement.
License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.
Proprietary
Closed source
Llama 4 Community License Agreement
Open weights
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
Gemini 3 Flash was released on 2025-12-17, while Llama 4 Maverick was released on 2025-04-05.
Gemini 3 Flash is 9 months newer than Llama 4 Maverick.
Dec 17, 2025
9 months ago
8mo newerApr 5, 2025
1.4 years ago
Knowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Gemini 3 Flash has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2025-01-31, while Llama 4 Maverick's cutoff date is not specified.
We can confirm Gemini 3 Flash's training data extends to 2025-01-31, but cannot make a direct comparison without Llama 4 Maverick's cutoff date.
Jan 2025
—
Provider Availability
Gemini 3 Flash is available from Google. Llama 4 Maverick is available from DeepInfra, Novita, Lambda, Groq, Fireworks, Together, Sambanova.
Gemini 3 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Outputs Comparison
Judge for yourself.
Run your own prompts against Gemini 3 Flash and Llama 4 Maverick side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.
FAQ
Common questions about Gemini 3 Flash vs Llama 4 Maverick.