Model Comparison

Gemini 3 Flash vs MiMo-V2-Flash

Gemini 3 Flash significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. MiMo-V2-Flash is 7.5x cheaper per token.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

5 benchmarks

Gemini 3 Flash outperforms in 5 benchmarks (AIME 2025, GPQA, Humanity's Last Exam, SWE-Bench Verified, Terminal-Bench 2.0), while MiMo-V2-Flash is better at 0 benchmarks.

Gemini 3 Flash significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Tue Apr 07 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

MiMo-V2-Flash costs less

For input processing, Gemini 3 Flash ($0.50/1M tokens) is 5.0x more expensive than MiMo-V2-Flash ($0.10/1M tokens).

For output processing, Gemini 3 Flash ($3.00/1M tokens) is 10.0x more expensive than MiMo-V2-Flash ($0.30/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Gemini 3 Flash is more expensive than MiMo-V2-Flash.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Tue Apr 07 2026 • llm-stats.com
Google
Gemini 3 Flash
Input tokens$0.50
Output tokens$3.00
Best providerGoogle
Xiaomi
MiMo-V2-Flash
Input tokens$0.10
Output tokens$0.30
Best providerXiaomi
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Gemini 3 Flash accepts 1,000,000 input tokens compared to MiMo-V2-Flash's 256,000 tokens. Gemini 3 Flash can generate longer responses up to 65,536 tokens, while MiMo-V2-Flash is limited to 16,384 tokens.

Google
Gemini 3 Flash
Input1,000,000 tokens
Output65,536 tokens
Xiaomi
MiMo-V2-Flash
Input256,000 tokens
Output16,384 tokens
Tue Apr 07 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Gemini 3 Flash supports multimodal inputs, whereas MiMo-V2-Flash does not.

Gemini 3 Flash can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Gemini 3 Flash

Text
Images
Audio
Video

MiMo-V2-Flash

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemini 3 Flash is licensed under a proprietary license, while MiMo-V2-Flash uses MIT.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemini 3 Flash

Proprietary

Closed source

MiMo-V2-Flash

MIT

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 3 Flash was released on 2025-12-17, while MiMo-V2-Flash was released on 2025-12-16.

Gemini 3 Flash is 0 month newer than MiMo-V2-Flash.

Gemini 3 Flash

Dec 17, 2025

3 months ago

1d newer
MiMo-V2-Flash

Dec 16, 2025

3 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemini 3 Flash has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2025-01-31, while MiMo-V2-Flash's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemini 3 Flash's training data extends to 2025-01-31, but cannot make a direct comparison without MiMo-V2-Flash's cutoff date.

Gemini 3 Flash

Jan 2025

MiMo-V2-Flash

—

Provider Availability

Gemini 3 Flash is available from Google. MiMo-V2-Flash is available from Xiaomi.

Gemini 3 Flash

google logo
Google
Input Price:Input: $0.50/1MOutput Price:Output: $3.00/1M

MiMo-V2-Flash

xiaomi logo
Xiaomi
Input Price:Input: $0.10/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.30/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Google
Larger context window (1,000,000 tokens)
Supports multimodal inputs
Higher AIME 2025 score (99.7% vs 94.1%)
Higher GPQA score (90.4% vs 83.7%)
Higher Humanity's Last Exam score (43.5% vs 22.1%)
Higher SWE-Bench Verified score (78.0% vs 73.4%)
Higher Terminal-Bench 2.0 score (47.6% vs 38.5%)
Xiaomi
Less expensive input tokens
Less expensive output tokens
Has open weights

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Google
Gemini 3 Flash
Xiaomi
MiMo-V2-Flash

FAQ

Common questions about Gemini 3 Flash vs MiMo-V2-Flash

Gemini 3 Flash significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Gemini 3 Flash is made by Google and MiMo-V2-Flash is made by Xiaomi. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.
Gemini 3 Flash scores Vending-Bench 2: 100.0%, AIME 2025: 99.7%, Global PIQA: 92.8%, MMMLU: 91.8%, GPQA: 90.4%. MiMo-V2-Flash scores AIME 2025: 94.1%, Arena-Hard v2: 86.2%, MMLU-Pro: 84.9%, HMMT 2025: 84.4%, GPQA: 83.7%.
MiMo-V2-Flash is 5.0x cheaper for input tokens. Gemini 3 Flash costs $0.50/M input and $3.00/M output via google. MiMo-V2-Flash costs $0.10/M input and $0.30/M output via xiaomi.
Gemini 3 Flash supports 1.0M tokens and MiMo-V2-Flash supports 256K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.
Key differences include context window (1.0M vs 256K), input pricing ($0.50 vs $0.10/M), multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Proprietary vs MIT). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.
Gemini 3 Flash is developed by Google and MiMo-V2-Flash is developed by Xiaomi.