Model Comparison

Gemini 3 Flash vs Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct

Gemini 3 Flash significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct is 1.9x cheaper per token.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

6 benchmarks

Gemini 3 Flash outperforms in 6 benchmarks (AIME 2025, CharXiv-R, MMMU-Pro, ScreenSpot Pro, SimpleQA, VideoMMMU), while Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct is better at 0 benchmarks.

Gemini 3 Flash significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Wed Jun 03 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct costs less

For input processing, Gemini 3 Flash ($0.50/1M tokens) is 1.7x more expensive than Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct ($0.30/1M tokens).

For output processing, Gemini 3 Flash ($3.00/1M tokens) is 2.0x more expensive than Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct ($1.49/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Gemini 3 Flash is more expensive than Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers

Wed Jun 03 2026 • llm-stats.com

Gemini 3 Flash

Input tokens$0.50

Output tokens$3.00

Best providerGoogle

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct

Input tokens$0.30

Output tokens$1.49

Best providerDeepinfra

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Gemini 3 Flash accepts 1,000,000 input tokens compared to Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct's 262,144 tokens. Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct can generate longer responses up to 262,144 tokens, while Gemini 3 Flash is limited to 65,536 tokens.

Gemini 3 Flash

Input1,000,000 tokens

Output65,536 tokens

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct

Input262,144 tokens

Output262,144 tokens

Wed Jun 03 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Both Gemini 3 Flash and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Gemini 3 Flash

Text

Images

Audio

Video

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct

Text

Images

Audio

Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemini 3 Flash is licensed under a proprietary license, while Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemini 3 Flash

Proprietary

Closed source

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 3 Flash was released on 2025-12-17, while Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct was released on 2025-09-22.

Gemini 3 Flash is 3 months newer than Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct.

Gemini 3 Flash

Dec 17, 2025

5 months ago

2mo newer

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct

Sep 22, 2025

8 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemini 3 Flash has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2025-01-31, while Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemini 3 Flash's training data extends to 2025-01-31, but cannot make a direct comparison without Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct's cutoff date.

Gemini 3 Flash

Jan 2025

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct

—

Provider Availability

Gemini 3 Flash is available from Google. Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct is available from DeepInfra, Novita.

Gemini 3 Flash

Google

Input Price:Input: $0.50/1MOutput Price:Output: $3.00/1M

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct

Deepinfra

Input Price:Input: $0.30/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.49/1M

Novita

Input Price:Input: $0.30/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.50/1M

* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Gemini 3 Flash

View details

Google

Larger context window (1,000,000 tokens)

Higher AIME 2025 score (99.7% vs 74.7%)

Higher CharXiv-R score (80.3% vs 62.1%)

Higher MMMU-Pro score (81.2% vs 68.1%)

Higher ScreenSpot Pro score (69.1% vs 62.0%)

Higher SimpleQA score (68.7% vs 51.9%)

Higher VideoMMMU score (86.9% vs 74.7%)

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct

View details

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Less expensive input tokens

Less expensive output tokens

Has open weights

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature	Gemini 3 Flash	Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct

FAQ

Common questions about Gemini 3 Flash vs Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct.

Which is better, Gemini 3 Flash or Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct?

Gemini 3 Flash significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Gemini 3 Flash is made by Google and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Gemini 3 Flash compare to Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct in benchmarks?

Gemini 3 Flash scores Vending-Bench 2: 100.0%, AIME 2025: 99.7%, Global PIQA: 92.8%, MMMLU: 91.8%, GPQA: 90.4%. Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct scores DocVQAtest: 97.1%, ScreenSpot: 95.4%, MMLU-Redux: 92.2%, OCRBench: 92.0%, MMBench-V1.1: 89.9%.

Is Gemini 3 Flash cheaper than Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct?

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct is 1.7x cheaper for input tokens. Gemini 3 Flash costs $0.50/M input and $3.00/M output via google. Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct costs $0.30/M input and $1.49/M output via deepinfra.

What are the context window sizes for Gemini 3 Flash and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct?

Gemini 3 Flash supports 1.0M tokens and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct supports 262K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Gemini 3 Flash and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct?

Key differences include context window (1.0M vs 262K), input pricing ($0.50 vs $0.30/M), licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemini 3 Flash and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct?

Gemini 3 Flash is developed by Google and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.