Gemini 3 Pro vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash
MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads the LLM Stats Score 45.6 to 38.6. MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 25.7x cheaper per token.
Google · Xiaomi · Updated for 2026
Which is better?
MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads the overall LLM Stats Score 45.6 to 38.6, ranking #29 overall.
On price, MiMo-V2.6-Flash is roughly 25.7x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.
Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.
Choose Gemini 3 Pro
- you want predictable pricing at $2.00/M input and $12.00/M output
Choose MiMo-V2.6-Flash
- overall performance matters — it scores 45.6 and ranks #29 on LLM Stats
- your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
- cost matters — it's about 25.7x cheaper per token
- you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026
- you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune
At a glance
The differences that matter most.
Capability indexes
Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks
Individual benchmarks
21 reported for Gemini 3 Pro · 16 for MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Gemini 3 Pro and MiMo-V2.6-Flashdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.
Human preference
Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
For input processing, Gemini 3 Pro ($2.00/1M tokens) is 14.3x more expensive than MiMo-V2.6-Flash ($0.14/1M tokens).
For output processing, Gemini 3 Pro ($12.00/1M tokens) is 42.9x more expensive than MiMo-V2.6-Flash ($0.28/1M tokens).
In conclusion, Gemini 3 Pro is more expensive than MiMo-V2.6-Flash.*
* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
Both models have the same input context window of 1,048,576 tokens. Only Gemini 3 Pro specifies output context (65,536 tokens).
Input capabilities
Documented input modalities across available providers
Both Gemini 3 Pro and MiMo-V2.6-Flash support multimodal inputs.
They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.
Gemini 3 Pro
MiMo-V2.6-Flash
License
Usage and distribution terms
Gemini 3 Pro is licensed under a proprietary license, while MiMo-V2.6-Flash uses MIT.
License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.
Proprietary
Closed source
MIT
Open weights
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
Gemini 3 Pro was released on 2025-11-18, while MiMo-V2.6-Flash was released on 2026-09-22.
MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 10 months newer than Gemini 3 Pro.
Nov 18, 2025
10 months ago
Sep 22, 2026
0 days ago
10mo newerKnowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Gemini 3 Pro has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2025-01-31, while MiMo-V2.6-Flash's cutoff date is not specified.
We can confirm Gemini 3 Pro's training data extends to 2025-01-31, but cannot make a direct comparison without MiMo-V2.6-Flash's cutoff date.
Jan 2025
—
Provider Availability
Gemini 3 Pro is available from Google. MiMo-V2.6-Flash is available from Xiaomi.
Gemini 3 Pro
MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Outputs Comparison
Judge for yourself.
Run your own prompts against Gemini 3 Pro and MiMo-V2.6-Flash side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.
FAQ
Common questions about Gemini 3 Pro vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash.