Model Comparison

Gemini 3 Pro vs Qwen3 30B A3B

Gemini 3 Pro significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Qwen3 30B A3B is 30.0x cheaper per token.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

2 benchmarks

Gemini 3 Pro outperforms in 2 benchmarks (AIME 2025, GPQA), while Qwen3 30B A3B is better at 0 benchmarks.

Gemini 3 Pro significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Tue May 05 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Qwen3 30B A3B costs less

For input processing, Gemini 3 Pro ($2.00/1M tokens) is 20.0x more expensive than Qwen3 30B A3B ($0.10/1M tokens).

For output processing, Gemini 3 Pro ($12.00/1M tokens) is 40.0x more expensive than Qwen3 30B A3B ($0.30/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Gemini 3 Pro is more expensive than Qwen3 30B A3B.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers

Tue May 05 2026 • llm-stats.com

Gemini 3 Pro

Input tokens$2.00

Output tokens$12.00

Best providerGoogle

Qwen3 30B A3B

Input tokens$0.10

Output tokens$0.30

Best providerDeepinfra

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Gemini 3 Pro accepts 1,048,576 input tokens compared to Qwen3 30B A3B's 128,000 tokens. Qwen3 30B A3B can generate longer responses up to 128,000 tokens, while Gemini 3 Pro is limited to 65,536 tokens.

Gemini 3 Pro

Input1,048,576 tokens

Output65,536 tokens

Qwen3 30B A3B

Input128,000 tokens

Output128,000 tokens

Tue May 05 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Gemini 3 Pro supports multimodal inputs, whereas Qwen3 30B A3B does not.

Gemini 3 Pro can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Gemini 3 Pro

Text

Images

Audio

Video

Qwen3 30B A3B

Text

Images

Audio

Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemini 3 Pro is licensed under a proprietary license, while Qwen3 30B A3B uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemini 3 Pro

Proprietary

Closed source

Qwen3 30B A3B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 3 Pro was released on 2025-11-18, while Qwen3 30B A3B was released on 2025-04-29.

Gemini 3 Pro is 7 months newer than Qwen3 30B A3B.

Gemini 3 Pro

Nov 18, 2025

5 months ago

6mo newer

Qwen3 30B A3B

Apr 29, 2025

1.0 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemini 3 Pro has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2025-01-31, while Qwen3 30B A3B's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemini 3 Pro's training data extends to 2025-01-31, but cannot make a direct comparison without Qwen3 30B A3B's cutoff date.

Gemini 3 Pro

Jan 2025

Qwen3 30B A3B

—

Provider Availability

Gemini 3 Pro is available from Google. Qwen3 30B A3B is available from DeepInfra, Novita, Fireworks.

Gemini 3 Pro

Google

Input Price:Input: $2.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $12.00/1M

Qwen3 30B A3B

Deepinfra

Input Price:Input: $0.10/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.30/1M

Novita

Input Price:Input: $0.10/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.44/1M

Fireworks

Input Price:Input: $0.89/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.89/1M

* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Gemini 3 Pro

View details

Google

Larger context window (1,048,576 tokens)

Supports multimodal inputs

Higher AIME 2025 score (100.0% vs 70.9%)

Higher GPQA score (91.9% vs 65.8%)

Qwen3 30B A3B

View details

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Less expensive input tokens

Less expensive output tokens

Has open weights

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature	Gemini 3 Pro	Qwen3 30B A3B

FAQ

Common questions about Gemini 3 Pro vs Qwen3 30B A3B.

Which is better, Gemini 3 Pro or Qwen3 30B A3B?

Gemini 3 Pro significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Gemini 3 Pro is made by Google and Qwen3 30B A3B is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Gemini 3 Pro compare to Qwen3 30B A3B in benchmarks?

Gemini 3 Pro scores AIME 2025: 100.0%, Vending-Bench 2: 100.0%, Global PIQA: 93.4%, GPQA: 91.9%, MMMLU: 91.8%. Qwen3 30B A3B scores Arena Hard: 91.0%, AIME 2024: 80.4%, LiveBench: 74.3%, Multi-IF: 72.2%, AIME 2025: 70.9%.

Is Gemini 3 Pro cheaper than Qwen3 30B A3B?

Qwen3 30B A3B is 20.0x cheaper for input tokens. Gemini 3 Pro costs $2.00/M input and $12.00/M output via google. Qwen3 30B A3B costs $0.10/M input and $0.30/M output via deepinfra.

What are the context window sizes for Gemini 3 Pro and Qwen3 30B A3B?

Gemini 3 Pro supports 1.0M tokens and Qwen3 30B A3B supports 128K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Gemini 3 Pro and Qwen3 30B A3B?

Key differences include context window (1.0M vs 128K), input pricing ($2.00 vs $0.10/M), multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemini 3 Pro and Qwen3 30B A3B?

Gemini 3 Pro is developed by Google and Qwen3 30B A3B is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.