The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

GLM-5.3 vs Qwen3 30B A3B

Comparing GLM-5.3 and Qwen3 30B A3B across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

Zhipu AI · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

GLM-5.3 and Qwen3 30B A3B trade strengths across price, capabilities, and technical limits. The better choice depends on the workload.

On price, Qwen3 30B A3B is roughly 14.3x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

GLM-5.3 also accepts a larger context window (1,000,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current benchmark, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose GLM-5.3

  • you process long inputs — it offers a 1,000,000 token context window
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Aug 2026

Choose Qwen3 30B A3B

  • cost matters — it's about 14.3x cheaper per token
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Benchmark wins
Input price
$1.40 / M
$0.10 / M
Output price
$4.40 / M
$0.30 / M
Context window
1,000,000
128,000
Released
Aug 2026
Apr 2025
License
Unknown
Apache 2.0

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

No common benchmarks found

GLM-5.3 and Qwen3 30B A3Bdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Arena Performance

Playground indexes and blind preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Qwen3 30B A3B costs less

For input processing, GLM-5.3 ($1.40/1M tokens) is 14.0x more expensive than Qwen3 30B A3B ($0.10/1M tokens).

For output processing, GLM-5.3 ($4.40/1M tokens) is 14.7x more expensive than Qwen3 30B A3B ($0.30/1M tokens).

In conclusion, GLM-5.3 is more expensive than Qwen3 30B A3B.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Mon Aug 24 2026 • llm-stats.com
Zhipu AI
GLM-5.3
Input tokens$1.40
Output tokens$4.40
Best providerUnknown Organization
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 30B A3B
Input tokens$0.10
Output tokens$0.30
Best providerDeepinfra
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

722.5B diff

GLM-5.3 has 722.5B more parameters than Qwen3 30B A3B, making it 2368.9% larger.

Zhipu AI
GLM-5.3
753.0Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 30B A3B
30.5Bparameters
753.0B
GLM-5.3
30.5B
Qwen3 30B A3B

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

GLM-5.3 accepts 1,000,000 input tokens compared to Qwen3 30B A3B's 128,000 tokens. Both models can generate responses up to 128,000 tokens.

Zhipu AI
GLM-5.3
Input1,000,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 30B A3B
Input128,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Mon Aug 24 2026 • llm-stats.com

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

GLM-5.3 was released on 2026-08-14, while Qwen3 30B A3B was released on 2025-04-29.

GLM-5.3 is 16 months newer than Qwen3 30B A3B.

GLM-5.3

Aug 14, 2026

1 weeks ago

1.3yr newer
Qwen3 30B A3B

Apr 29, 2025

1.3 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

GLM-5.3 is available from ZAI. Qwen3 30B A3B is available from DeepInfra, Novita, Fireworks.

GLM-5.3

z logo
Unknown Organization
Input Price:Input: $1.40/1MOutput Price:Output: $4.40/1M

Qwen3 30B A3B

deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.10/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.30/1M
novita logo
Novita
Input Price:Input: $0.10/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.44/1M
fireworks logo
Fireworks
Input Price:Input: $0.89/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.89/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against GLM-5.3 and Qwen3 30B A3B side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

GLM-5.3
✓ Preferred
Qwen3 30B A3B
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about GLM-5.3 vs Qwen3 30B A3B.

Which is better, GLM-5.3 or Qwen3 30B A3B?

GLM-5.3 (Zhipu AI) and Qwen3 30B A3B (Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team) each have strengths in different areas. Compare their benchmark scores, pricing, context windows, and capabilities above to determine which fits your needs.

How does GLM-5.3 compare to Qwen3 30B A3B in benchmarks?

GLM-5.3 scores Terminal-Bench 2.1: 88.2%, CyberGym: 84.5%, FrontierSWE: 78.1%, Toolathlon: 73.0%, DeepSWE 1.1: 66.9%. Qwen3 30B A3B scores Arena Hard: 91.0%, AIME 2024: 80.4%, LiveBench: 74.3%, Multi-IF: 72.2%, AIME 2025: 70.9%.

Is GLM-5.3 cheaper than Qwen3 30B A3B?

Qwen3 30B A3B is 14.0x cheaper for input tokens. GLM-5.3 costs $1.40/M input and $4.40/M output via z. Qwen3 30B A3B costs $0.10/M input and $0.30/M output via deepinfra.

What are the context window sizes for GLM-5.3 and Qwen3 30B A3B?

GLM-5.3 supports 1.0M tokens and Qwen3 30B A3B supports 128K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between GLM-5.3 and Qwen3 30B A3B?

Key differences include context window (1.0M vs 128K), input pricing ($1.40 vs $0.10/M), licensing (Unknown vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes GLM-5.3 and Qwen3 30B A3B?

GLM-5.3 is developed by Zhipu AI and Qwen3 30B A3B is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.