Model Comparison
Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite vs Gemini 3.5 Flash-LiteWhich is better in 2026?
Both models are evenly matched across the benchmarks. Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite is 1.5x cheaper per token.
Verdict: Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite vs Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite — which is better?
Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (by Google) and Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (by Google) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.
Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite outperforms in 1 benchmarks (MRCR v2 (8-needle)), while Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite is better at 1 benchmark (CharXiv-R). Both models are evenly matched across the benchmarks.
On price, Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite is roughly 1.5x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite also accepts a larger context window (1,048,576 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.
Choose Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite if…
- cost matters — it's about 1.5x cheaper per token
Choose Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite if…
- you process long inputs — it offers a 1,048,576 token context window
- you want the most recent training data — it shipped Jul 2026
Performance Benchmarks
Comparative analysis across standard metrics
Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite outperforms in 1 benchmarks (MRCR v2 (8-needle)), while Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite is better at 1 benchmark (CharXiv-R).
Both models are evenly matched across the benchmarks.
Arena Performance
Human preference votes
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
For input processing, Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite ($0.25/1M tokens) is 1.2x cheaper than Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite ($0.30/1M tokens).
For output processing, Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite ($1.50/1M tokens) is 1.7x cheaper than Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite ($2.50/1M tokens).
In conclusion, Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite is more expensive than Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite.*
* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite accepts 1,048,576 input tokens compared to Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite's 1,000,000 tokens. Both models can generate responses up to 65,536 tokens.
Input Capabilities
Supported data types and modalities
Both Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite and Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite support multimodal inputs.
They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.
Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
License
Usage and distribution terms
Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.
Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.
Proprietary
Closed source
Proprietary
Closed source
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite was released on 2026-03-03, while Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite was released on 2026-07-21.
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite is 5 months newer than Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite.
Mar 3, 2026
4 months ago
Jul 21, 2026
1 weeks ago
4mo newerKnowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite has a knowledge cutoff of 2025-01-31, while Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite has a cutoff of 2026-03-31.
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite has more recent training data (up to 2026-03-31), making it potentially better informed about events through that date compared to Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (2025-01-31).
Jan 2025
Mar 2026
1.2 yr newerProvider Availability
Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite is available from Google. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite is available from Google.
Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Outputs Comparison
Key Takeaways
Detailed Comparison
Interactive Arena
Judge for yourself.
Run your own prompts against Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite and Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.
| Feature |
|---|
FAQ
Common questions about Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite vs Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite.