Model Comparison
Gemini 3.1 Pro vs Claude 3 SonnetWhich is better in 2026?
Gemini 3.1 Pro significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Gemini 3.1 Pro is 1.1x cheaper per token.
Verdict: Gemini 3.1 Pro vs Claude 3 Sonnet — which is better?
Gemini 3.1 Pro (by Google) and Claude 3 Sonnet (by Anthropic) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.
Gemini 3.1 Pro outperforms in 1 benchmarks (GPQA), while Claude 3 Sonnet is better at 0 benchmarks. Gemini 3.1 Pro significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.
On price, Gemini 3.1 Pro is roughly 1.1x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.
Gemini 3.1 Pro also accepts a larger context window (1,048,576 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.
Choose Gemini 3.1 Pro if…
- you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 1 of 1 shared benchmarks
- cost matters — it's about 1.1x cheaper per token
- you process long inputs — it offers a 1,048,576 token context window
- you want the most recent training data — it shipped Feb 2026
Choose Claude 3 Sonnet if…
- you want predictable pricing at $3.00/M input and $15.00/M output
Performance Benchmarks
Comparative analysis across standard metrics
Gemini 3.1 Pro outperforms in 1 benchmarks (GPQA), while Claude 3 Sonnet is better at 0 benchmarks.
Gemini 3.1 Pro significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.
Arena Performance
Human preference votes
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
For input processing, Gemini 3.1 Pro ($2.50/1M tokens) is 1.2x cheaper than Claude 3 Sonnet ($3.00/1M tokens).
For output processing, Gemini 3.1 Pro ($15.00/1M tokens) costs the same as Claude 3 Sonnet ($15.00/1M tokens).
In conclusion, Claude 3 Sonnet is more expensive than Gemini 3.1 Pro.*
* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
Gemini 3.1 Pro accepts 1,048,576 input tokens compared to Claude 3 Sonnet's 200,000 tokens. Claude 3 Sonnet can generate longer responses up to 200,000 tokens, while Gemini 3.1 Pro is limited to 65,536 tokens.
Input Capabilities
Supported data types and modalities
Both Gemini 3.1 Pro and Claude 3 Sonnet support multimodal inputs.
They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Claude 3 Sonnet
License
Usage and distribution terms
Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.
Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.
Proprietary
Closed source
Proprietary
Closed source
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
Gemini 3.1 Pro was released on 2026-02-19, while Claude 3 Sonnet was released on 2024-02-29.
Gemini 3.1 Pro is 24 months newer than Claude 3 Sonnet.
Feb 19, 2026
3 months ago
2.0yr newerFeb 29, 2024
2.3 years ago
Knowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Gemini 3.1 Pro has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2025-01-31, while Claude 3 Sonnet's cutoff date is not specified.
We can confirm Gemini 3.1 Pro's training data extends to 2025-01-31, but cannot make a direct comparison without Claude 3 Sonnet's cutoff date.
Jan 2025
—
Provider Availability
Gemini 3.1 Pro is available from Google. Claude 3 Sonnet is available from Anthropic, Bedrock, Google.
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Claude 3 Sonnet
Outputs Comparison
Key Takeaways
Claude 3 Sonnet
View detailsAnthropic
No standout differentiators in the data we have for this pair.
Detailed Comparison
| Feature |
|---|
FAQ
Common questions about Gemini 3.1 Pro vs Claude 3 Sonnet.